Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT); So, Maybe what we users are asking for is a menu-selectable NR algorithm, one optimized for CW (similar to the present one) and the other for SSB. A software issue, not necessarily requiring a new ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00114.html (12,665 bytes)
142. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:08:30 -0400 (EDT); I don't have a Yaesu 5000 to listen to, but I think all of us on this reflector with Orion IIs agree that the DSP NR needs further work. It works pretty well (for me at least) on CW, but there is muc; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00142.html (11,700 bytes)
143. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:13:56 -0400 (EDT); Carl, I'd agree with that, with the possible exception of 6 meters if including it would affect performance on the other bands. John H? What do you think about that? 73 Ray In a message dated 5/18/20; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00143.html (11,686 bytes)
144. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:45:26 -0400 (EDT); Bsrry and Carl, We're all entitled to our opinions, based on our own experience. All I can say is the NR (2.044A and 2.039d) helps me pull out weak CW signals on 80 and 160, especially with a wide ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00149.html (9,025 bytes)
145. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Firmware Version V1.810 Posted, RX320D GUI Posted. Pegasus... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:32:31 -0400 (EDT); A few. My Argo V is v1.08b. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/24/2011 12:30:12 P.M. GMT Standard Time, kd2e@comcast.net writes: Just curious....Did the Argo V have any updates? I ask because from the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00192.html (10,732 bytes)
146. Re: [TenTec] Firmware Updates (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:42:16 -0400 (EDT); Jim, The latest version incorporates all previous updates. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/26/2011 3:34:23 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jliving39@comcast.net writes: Guys, Also have an ARGO V and OMNI VI; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00200.html (7,241 bytes)
147. Re: [TenTec] Frequency output from Orion 2 via Cat Port (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:30:42 -0400 (EDT); Dave, The Orion II provides it -- frequency info comes up on MixW and HRD. I don't have Carl's software, so someone else (Carl?) will have to say how to configure it. 73 Ray W In a message dated 4/21; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00270.html (9,048 bytes)
148. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1 and Orion 2 advice (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:44:00 -0500 (EST); Gentlemen, Thanks for whatever wisdom you may share. I have the opportunity to purchase a new rig to replace my Yaesu ft 897d. The Yaesu is fine and I have about 250 countries on it with my log anten; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00043.html (8,119 bytes)
149. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:57:14 -0400 (EDT); Hi John, I just did some experimenting. I generally use UCW, but for this test I set the O2 to LCW and turned it on. It came up at 2400 Hz. I then set BW to 500 Hz, turned off the radio, and turned i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00191.html (9,374 bytes)
150. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:51:33 -0400 (EDT); Yes, the need to cycle stack memories in order to preserve them was part of v2.044A. John Henry wrote about that a few months ago. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 3/20/2011 8:42:45 P.M. GMT Standard T; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00200.html (10,178 bytes)
151. Re: [TenTec] orion beta firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:32:44 -0500 (EST); Steve, Do you mean 2.041XT, or is there a more recent one that I'm not familiar with? As for 2.041XT. I liked the waterfall display but didn't like the NR, which is better in 2.044A. 73 Ray W2RS. In; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00167.html (7,297 bytes)
152. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:00:57 -0500 (EST); Hi John, I hear you about the 566. V2.044A is very good, but please don't forget about the waterfall display. I'm not at all convinced I would want a high speed sweep board, but I did like the old wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00337.html (8,338 bytes)
153. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:33:26 -0500 (EST); In 2.041XT, the waterfall was not instead of the sweep display, it was a menu-driven option. If you would rather have the sweep display, you could choose that. What I liked about the waterfall was th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00359.html (9,667 bytes)
154. [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:11:21 -0500 (EST); John, I operated my Orion II this weekend in the AWA's AM QSO Party, and noticed that the transmit equalization is quite a bit different between AM and SSB. On SSB, it sounded best when flat (0 dB),; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00394.html (8,176 bytes)
155. Re: [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:31:53 -0500 (EST); John, Further to my earlier email, I ran some more tests, listening to myself on an external receiver (actually, an Argonaut V). The difference in equalization between AM and SSB did not show up ther; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00398.html (8,503 bytes)
156. Re: [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:43:21 -0500 (EST); Ron, It sounds that way to me too. Hope T-T includes the monitor in their next revision. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/21/2011 8:34:56 P.M. GMT Standard Time, ronc@sonic.net writes: There is a dis; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00409.html (10,021 bytes)
157. Re: [TenTec] Orion on AM (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:45:34 -0500 (EST); Bob, It is a form of controlled carrier, but the Orions already have great RF speech processors built in. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/21/2011 11:31:18 P.M. GMT Standard Time, k4bg@planters.net w; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00410.html (7,286 bytes)
158. Re: [TenTec] KPA 500 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:22:24 -0500 (EST); Hi George, Yes, my experience with solid state amps is also that they can't take abuse as well as a tube amp can. Tube amps are also better value for money. For those who really need no-tune bandswit; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00477.html (13,431 bytes)
159. Re: [TenTec] pr40 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:47:49 -0500 (EST); I don't do that much SSB but am very pleased with the 707 Regal. It needs more gain than condenser mikes (HW gain 12 dB, MIC 55 with my voice) but it sounds great. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/26; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00551.html (13,086 bytes)
160. Re: [TenTec] Orion II sweep display? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:44:49 -0500 (EST); Tim, I don't know what you mean by "freezes," but when I turn the VFO knob the display doesn't move for about one second. That's enough for me to tune close to the desired signal, if not right on it.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00557.html (9,052 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]