Mail Archive Search: <+from:rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT); And even the sainted KWM-2, one of which I've had for 50 years, gets bad reports on CW because of the way it generates it -- inserts an audio tone into the SSB TX. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00067.html (7,672 bytes)
262. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 10:21:21 -0400 (EDT); Lee, I use mine too, mostly on 20 and 15 SSB. It has the DX Engineering speech processor installed and, as you said, it really gets through. Most of the time I don't even have to turn on the 30L-1. 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00069.html (7,281 bytes)
263. [TenTec] 566 firmware? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:54:54 -0400 (EDT); Hi John, Anything to report on an upgrade to 566v3.029? There were a few issues, none earthshaking, but there nonetheless. Tnx, Ray |W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00044.html (6,351 bytes)
264. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:04:17 -0400 (EDT); As I recall, that was a problem with the QST review of the O II. The reviewer wrote that he was an Icom user and not really familiar with operating it. From what I've observed, operating TT and Elelc; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00087.html (7,917 bytes)
265. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:03:08 -0400 (EDT); Yes, Barry, but you're in Bob's first group, people who know what they're doing. A few years ago, a generous member made a gift to our club station (WE7GV) of a Yaesu Mk V that he wasn't using. I hoo; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00093.html (8,029 bytes)
266. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:52:14 -0400 (EDT); You guys are lucky to belong to clubs with any CW ops at all. 90% of our FD ops couldn't do CW if fheir lives depended on it. We have two good CW ops (K3RN and W9NGA) who take the graveyard shift and; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00105.html (8,016 bytes)
267. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:48:03 -0400 (EDT); Perry, Yes, I made 3 CW QSOs on FO-29 at our FD site this year. BTW, Sputnik I didn't go HI HI. It sounded more like a squeak. It was OSCAR I that said HI 73 Ray W2RS ________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00128.html (8,280 bytes)
268. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:56:59 -0400 (EDT); Tnx, Perry. I don't know about that legend stuff. Lots of hams copied Sputnik, etc. but I was one of those who got written up in the press. You're right about those being different times. The USA was; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00140.html (8,594 bytes)
269. Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:17:38 -0400 (EDT); Jim, I agree with most of what you've been saying, but this comment goes a bit far.. Amateur radio has been provided for in the ITU Radio Regulations since 1927, and many of the countries which are p; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00158.html (7,659 bytes)
270. Re: [TenTec] Just a 'foot-in-mouth' observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:32:03 -0400 (EDT); Yes, FD has evolved into a contest. However, like all contests, not everybody competes seriously. Some do, and go all out to win. Others just dip their toes in and have fun. All are welcome. Jim's cl; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00161.html (7,733 bytes)
271. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:51:20 -0400 (EDT); My first Ten-Tec product was a KR-40 keyer that I bought in 1971. Before that I used a bug but decided to take pity on those listening to my CW. I still have the keyer. It's now part of my satellite; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00111.html (7,311 bytes)
272. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:37:45 -0400 (EDT); Tnx, Al. I'll check out the eHam review. 73 Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00115.html (7,850 bytes)
273. Re: [TenTec] ORION 1 vs ORION2 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:43:37 -0400 (EDT); I'm not a serious contester, but can see why one would want two copies of the same rig for SO2R, or multiple copies for multi-op operating positions. As to names for the rigs, I don't have a 565 but; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00041.html (7,741 bytes)
274. Re: [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:03:20 -0400 (EDT); The oldestl T-T rig I have is an Argonaut V. It does a great job of driving my 1208 6-meter transverter, which I don't have to worry about frying. 73 Ray W2RS , ______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00107.html (7,267 bytes)
275. [TenTec] Hamfest (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:46:32 -0400 (EDT); Any word from TT on the long-promised firmware fixes for the 565/566? 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00371.html (6,270 bytes)
276. [TenTec] 566 v3.029 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:20:29 -0400 (EDT); Hi John, One more to add to the list of needed fixes: unlike the v2 firmware, the speech processor does not function on AM. Tnx & 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-10/msg00169.html (6,404 bytes)
277. [TenTec] 566 v3.029 and 707 Regal mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:06:19 -0500 (EST); Hi, I'm still playing around with Orion II settings for the 707 Regal microphone, using v3.029 firmware. My best for SSB so far are: MIC 55 H/W MIC GAIN 14 dB SP 2 L.F. ROLLOFF 200 Hz TX FILTER BW 39; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-11/msg00125.html (7,147 bytes)
278. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.029 and 707 Regal mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:24:52 -0500 (EST); Tnx Barry. When I go from 3900 to 3000 Hz I lose a litle treble response, but the main thing that goes down is the hiss. For SSB, it's probably a good trade-off. I then tried -10 dB EQ, and the resul; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-11/msg00135.html (7,812 bytes)
279. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.029 and 707 Regal mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:46:08 -0500 (EST); FYI, the output impedance of the 709A is 600 ohms, while that of the 707 is 50k ohms. The O2 specs call for >10k. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-11/msg00139.html (7,601 bytes)
280. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.029 and 707 Regal mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:20:38 -0500 (EST); Tnx for that. Bob, K4TAX, explained it off line. BTW, T-T has since changed the source impedance of the 707 mic to 250 ohms. Maybe it should be called the 707v2? 73 Ray W2RS _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00002.html (11,877 bytes)

Current List: 261 - 280
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]