Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rtgsdad@mchsi.com: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Re: 516 Price in Perspective (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:37:58 -0500
The consumer and producer price indices are weighted-average samples of marketbaskets of goods which are believed to reflect the spending habits of either a personal consumer or producer. Productivit
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00623.html (15,069 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Guidance on Linear Amplifier Choice (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:25:18 -0600
John, I had an AL-1200 and loved it (sold it to my brother) and now run an AL-1500. FYI, the AL-1200 is not instant on; the 3CX1200A7 is ceramic and has about same warm-up time as the 8877...but it i
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00181.html (8,040 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Orion (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:05:47 -0500
Clarification on the dual 32 bit processors, please: are they working in tandem, or is one dediccated to the primary transceiver and the other to the second receiver? Thanks, Art KC2G
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00251.html (6,246 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:06:42 -0500
I tend to disagree with the "saving grace" comment that all manufacturers have the same opportunity to get bashed. Perhaps the opportunity is the same...that might require probability theory...but th
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00708.html (14,887 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:40:01 -0500
Hi Steve, Scott implied, or perhaps stated, that some of the negative reviews are being written by employees of distributorships that cannot sell Ten-Tec gear. Everyone who gets turned off to a Jupit
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00714.html (18,872 bytes)

26. [TenTec] Seeking help on report of "wide" signal (score: 1)
Author: rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Arthur T)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:30:26 -0500
Hi All, Got my first report of a "wide" signal on 20 CW tonight...very technical term, I know...my guess is the guy was running his noise blanker and I was pumping his AGC, since all he sent was that
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00804.html (6,770 bytes)

27. [TenTec] "wide" sig (score: 1)
Author: rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Arthur T)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:50:27 -0500
If anyone is listening...I'm on 14.036.34 now Art KC2G
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00807.html (6,225 bytes)

28. [TenTec] "Wide" sig (score: 1)
Author: rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Arthur T)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:28:52 -0500
Thanks all for your replies. Several of you monitored, one of you telephoned me, and one tried to QSO me...but propagation was not there! All the reports were consistent...somebody's RX just couldn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00808.html (6,451 bytes)

29. [TenTec] It's "Only" 1.7 dB (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:58:29 -0600
Perhaps the person concerned about the power output runs a grounded-grid amplifier with 3-500Z's, in which case, on some bands, 110 to 120 watts drive may be necessary to produce full output. That sa
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00702.html (10,676 bytes)

30. [TenTec] It's "Only" 1.7 dB (score: 1)
Author: Art" <rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Art)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:15:56 -0600
Or it's just the sense that "if I pay this much for a rig, it ought to deliver more." I've gotten spoiled, like many, and while I used to run QRP quite often now find I heat up the 8877 more than I o
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00707.html (13,314 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Off Topic (desktop themes) (score: 1)
Author: rtgsdad@mchsi.com (Arthur T)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:45:16 -0600
Anyone here have or know of any ham-oriented desktop themes available? If not...there's a project for one of the programmers in the group.... Art KC2G
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00966.html (6,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu