- 41. [TenTec] LogiKey 3 (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 23:57:06 -0800
- I Doubt if it would be a problem. However, if you're concerned about over voltage, there are easy ways to lower the voltage. Obviously a 3 term regulator, resistor and zener diode, etc. Or - put a co
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00158.html (8,365 bytes)
- 42. [TenTec] Reducing the output of Corsair II to QRP (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 08:00:28 -0800
- If I might, I'd like to give you qrp'ers a little food for thought. When lowering the output level of 100 watts transmitters into the qrp range, a little thought should be given to the idea that some
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00206.html (8,257 bytes)
- 43. [TenTec] Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Impact of Reflected Power (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 14:37:17 -0800
- Okay Guys: No matter what the type of transline, if significant vswr is present, the resulting nulls and peaks will radiate. Granted, not much - but, it will distort the radiating pattern due to in/o
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-07/msg00327.html (9,706 bytes)
- 44. [TenTec] fsk (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 15:20:19 +0100
- Tom: Are you using the built in FSK or AFSK? If you're using FSK, you will have to adjust the local oscillator to the proper frequency. Unfortunately, you may have to use 200 hz shift instead of the
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-06/msg00083.html (8,063 bytes)
- 45. [TenTec] zip (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 14:16:00 -0800
- Gee - now you know what we live with week to week! de KL7HF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contestin
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00023.html (7,604 bytes)
- 46. [TenTec] http://www.pfrr.alaska.edu/~pfrr/DATA/VHF-RT.HTM#PLOTS (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 23:28:39 +0100
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_01BD77B4.5E65F240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The aurora has finally subsided. 2 full we
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00025.html (7,880 bytes)
- 47. [TenTec] Oh No!! I think it's broke!!! (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 11:50:29 -0800
- Hello Reid. It is normal for Balanced to need nulling periodically. In fact all radios should be checked a couple of times a year. It is just the nature of components to age slowly, and no matter wha
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00050.html (10,628 bytes)
- 48. Fw: [TenTec] Oh No!! I think it's broke!!! (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 11:58:18 -0800
- OOOOPPPS This sentence should have said "Balanced Modulator". Another instance of no direct connection from brain to hands. de KL7HF - -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissio
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00051.html (7,317 bytes)
- 49. [TenTec] TenTec Service (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 17:05:23 +0100
- I've watched the messages mentioning factory service and I'd like to bring some food for thought. Everyone knows that the service dep't is second to none in customer satisfaction. But - doesn't sendi
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00138.html (8,103 bytes)
- 50. [TenTec] keyer (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 23:15:15 +0100
- Jim: During a whole lot of years contesting, I met a couple of guys like you who could log with the left hand while sending with the right. I always envied the heck out of those guys. Then, I went to
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00271.html (8,394 bytes)
- 51. [TenTec] "Hang" AGC? (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 14:06:04 -0800
- AGC terminoogy in radio is "Attack" for the start of the agc action, and "Hang" for the decay of the agc action. The times refer to how long it takes for the gain of the effected stage to be reduced,
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00321.html (7,186 bytes)
- 52. [TenTec] Ten Tec SSB User's Net (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 08:33:15 -0800
- How bout the frequency? de KL7HF dust -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00338.html (7,674 bytes)
- 53. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 07:11:02 -0800
- Hi Guys: There's a bit more to the subject than what has been covered. The general coverage aspect is obvious. However - if you are a casual operator, working your buddy down the block, then the Para
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00394.html (11,202 bytes)
- 54. [TenTec] Omni V & Paragon (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 10:34:48 -0800
- Hi Dave: Never said it was a bad rig - just that the Omni series is much better in a heavy rf environment. That's not a guess, that's a matter of physics. Sorry if I insulted your Paragon. de KL7HF -
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-05/msg00402.html (9,111 bytes)
- 55. [TenTec] what to do? (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 14:05:10 -0800
- Hi Doug: I won't get into the contest of whether you should trade or not. All I can do is to let you know my experience as an owner of both. The OMNI-6 is a much better radio, but there are places th
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00207.html (9,744 bytes)
- 56. [TenTec] You asked about the Scout..... (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay)
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:59:39 -0800
- Hi Bill: There is a relationship in a "Linear"amplifier between the lowest end drive to output. An amp that is truly linear will have linear output/input. In defense of the Commission, writing a law
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00225.html (8,540 bytes)
- 57. [TenTec] IF modified, isn't that home brew (score: 1)
- Author: seay@alaska.net (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:51:24 +0100
- It is, and always has been a violation to use an amplfier on the citizens band. Therefore, making an amplifier for that purpose says a lot for a company that did! Then again, it does not meet type ac
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00244.html (8,602 bytes)
- 58. [TenTec] Paragon Mod?? (score: 1)
- Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay)
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:43:38 +0100
- The FL-7000 works fine with the TenTec QSK scheme. If you watch the red lights on the front of the amp, it tells you that the transfer scheme is waiting for all to make the receive/transmit transitio
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00299.html (9,018 bytes)
- 59. [TenTec] T-Kit Receiver #1254 (score: 1)
- Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay)
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 07:32:35 -0900
- After playing with the little 1254 this weekend, I thought I'd come in to work early and throw the test equipment on it and see what it looked like. I had only done the non-test equip alignment when
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00008.html (7,813 bytes)
- 60. [TenTec] Synchronous detection (score: 1)
- Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay)
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 13:27:42 -0900
- Well - yes & no, Peter. While the main synthesizer is in 5 kHz steps on am, the bandspread, or "Clarifier" if you will, tunes the entire 5 kHz, so you in effect have continuous tuning. de KL7HF -- To
- /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00036.html (7,931 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu