Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tberry1@triad.rr.com: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] FS: Ten-Tec Orion II w RX366 subreceiver (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:46:55 -0500
Barry, I am sorry to see you selling your Orion / RX-366. Guess your main rig now is the K3? 73 Tom AA4VV On 12/30/2015 11:17 AM, Barry N1EU wrote: I have a very nice Orion II for sale, including the
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00383.html (8,661 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] 565v3.026 ready at TenTec for download (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:04:00 -0500
I have a 565 with no modifications at all. The V3 firmware works just great 73 Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00042.html (8,926 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Eagle roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:36:23 -0500
Does the Eagle use the same roofing filters that the Orion II uses? Can I get INRAD filters for the Orion II to use in the RX-366 board? 73 Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00124.html (7,230 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] RX366, v3 firmware (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:34:33 -0500
Thanks Barry, Very interesting. I am looking forward to getting V3 and RX366. 73 Tom AA4VV I've posted a new Web page sharing some thoughts and sound clips on the RX366 and the new "Selective Audio F
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-01/msg00259.html (8,300 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:45:34 -0500
On the RX366 board there will be a 9MHz output via TMP connector. Does anybody know if that means I can connect the output from the 9MHZ IF to my QS1R SDR receiver directly and see the waterfall disp
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00243.html (8,624 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] RX366 Update (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:37:39 -0500
Thanks Stephen, It looks like at most I would need the Z10000B-U buffer amp. Thanks Tom AA4VV On 12/23/2011 6:11 PM, Stephen Cannon wrote: Tom, Not sure about the QS1R SDR, but it should work fine wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00245.html (9,628 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion s-meter calibration (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:17:11 -0500
Let me see if I understand this function. I would select an S meter value (say S9) then change the digital count so that the S meter reads S9. Is that correct? 73 Tom AA4VV 73, Barry N1EU AL7CR _____
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00338.html (9,078 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion s-meter calibration (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:54:35 -0500
Thanks Barry. OK on not recommending that anybody change them. I'm curious as to how AL7CR knew that feature was there.. 73 Tom AA4VV Barry N1EU 73 Tom AA4VV 73, Barry N1EU On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 7:
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00342.html (10,475 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:08:38 -0400
Carl, I saw your reply on the TenTec list. Were you a Beta tester? If so.. How does it work? I am really looking forward to getting the rx366. Thanks 73 Tom AA4VV On 9/27/2011 8:52 AM, Carl Moreschi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00106.html (8,445 bytes)

10. [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:05:12 -0400
I am surprised that the new RX366 sub receiver for the Orion has not been mentioned here. It is supposed to be basically the Eagle RX inserted into the Orion(s) sub RX. I am looking forward to it as
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00428.html (8,469 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Original Orion Firmware (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:29:21 -0400
Modifiy AGC to reduce affect of short RF pulses on AGC response. 73 Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-08/msg00242.html (8,582 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] What's Next? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:49:18 -0400
On 6/3/2010 10:50 AM, Henry, John wrote: We will begin reviewing the current status of the Original Orion V1 and V2 firmware. Assessing open problems, customer requests, etc., and developing a plan o
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00114.html (7,964 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] What's Next? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Berry <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:52:37 -0400
sorry , I sent the last message by mistake. Tom On 6/3/2010 10:50 AM, Henry, John wrote: We will begin reviewing the current status of the Original Orion V1 and V2 firmware. Assessing open problems,
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-07/msg00115.html (8,445 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] 2.063Xg -- AF AGC problem (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:37:18 -0400
noise reduction seems too aggressive. As a matter of fact at an NR setting of >1 it eliminates the signal? Completely! Rick , it does that on mine also. But if you wait a few seconds there does seem
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-05/msg00152.html (7,417 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Lone voice in the wind (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:25:10 -0500
That sounds great Carl, Does it have the ability to adjust the volume of both receivers at the same time. If not that would be a good enhancement in my humble opinioin. Thanks Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00262.html (9,783 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:35:40 -0400
I have an Orion and am using V2 of the firmware. I will have to say I really love the radio and enjoy using it very much. I would gladly pay for firmware updates but I don't know how Ten-Tec would do
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00261.html (9,696 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:13:31 -0400
Lee, No you are not missing anything. It is correct that I have paid for the radio and have a resonable expectation of some good firmware. Guess what I am saying is that I would pay for some top-of-
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00264.html (10,235 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:37:54 -0400
Beach.. you are You do have a point there... 73 Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00266.html (9,356 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] FS: Orion 565 with accesssories (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:49:20 -0400
Jerry, I see occasionally where people mention additional upgrades performed at TenTec. Can you tell me what the upgrades are?? I have an Orion and was wondering if it is worthwhile to send it back.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00396.html (7,227 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] ORION II CW pile up readability (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:44:14 -0500
Does this discussion apply to the original Orion also? 73 Tom AA4VV
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00005.html (8,642 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu