Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tlogan7@cox.net: 180 ]

Total 180 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Re: [TenTec] Argosy mods and serial nrs. question (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:29:20 -0400
Hi Blair - Here is the website. Look on the left hand column and click on MODS - you will see several rigs listed and the related mods. 73/Tim http://www.qsl.net/tentec/
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00716.html (8,671 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Found Model 227 tuner; need Model 225 P/S (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:36:42 -0400
Got lucky and found a working tuner that needs a bit of scrubbing. Still looking for an original Midel 225 P/S if anyone happens to have one. Thanks again. Tim
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00724.html (6,797 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Argosy mods and serial nrs. question (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 20:55:55 -0700
Hi Bill - The article you are talking about is actually the article in The Unofficial Ten Tec website - and you are right - they are great mods - sounds like Ten Tec never took the hint though. Thank
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00734.html (9,436 bytes)

24. Re: Re: [TenTec] INRAD Filter Question (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 16:43:38 -0400
I had the same experience Jim had. At first I thought I had done the right thing on my Omni V with Inrad filters. However, I now have an Omni VI+ and far prefer the TenTec filters. I would not put In
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00929.html (10,968 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Omni VI+ for code practice (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:07:46 -0500
Hi folks - I would like to be able to flip a switch and use my Omni VI option 3 for practicing code sending without actually transmitting. Can anyone get me started in the right direction for such a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00043.html (7,707 bytes)

26. Re: Re: [TenTec] FS Omni 6 plus op3 (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:44:17 -0500
Hey folks - With the Inrads it sounds like a pretty good deal to me! My 2 cents. 73/Tim NZ7C
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00114.html (8,807 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] External Speaker -- 307B (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:50:08 -0500
Grant - I would assume it is like any other radio mnf's overpriced speakers...although I have not owned one and I note that several on the reflector have said they liked theirs. I run all my rigs int
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00116.html (8,106 bytes)

28. [TenTec] Clarification on speakers (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:05:50 -0500
Folks - I should clarify my earlier comments. I have never owned a Tentec 307, but I have a generalized prejudice that radio manufacturers sell speakers at a premium because the cosmetics of the spea
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00125.html (7,189 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Confusion re Inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 19:36:26 -0700
Hi folks - Inrad has the following filters listed: All are listed as suitable for Omni V and VI rigs. Which four filters would be used on an Omni VI setup for cw with a 400 in N-1 and a 250 in N-2? I
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00332.html (7,551 bytes)

30. [TenTec] Re: inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:57:29 -0400
Rob - I have gotten no replies, but I am pretty sure there is some kind of adjustment that has to be made regarding where the 2.8 filter centers - but I also have no clue what that means. I also do n
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00364.html (9,313 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Re: inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:33:25 -0700
Barry - What exactly - in very simple terms - does "adjust carrier balance" mean? Or, what topic should I look under in the Handbook to teach myself? Sorry I'm so ignorant about this. Thanks and 73/T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00370.html (9,094 bytes)

32. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re: inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:17:46 -0400
Mike - That's what I needed - a place to start! Thanks very much. I do appreciate it and I will check the handbook now :-) 73/Tim NZ7C
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00372.html (10,894 bytes)

33. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re: inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:29:41 -0400
George - Thank you. Is the insertion frequency the same thing as the center frequency? In my original question I mentioned that there were TWO Inrad 400Hz filters - one with a 9000.6 center freq - an
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00377.html (16,309 bytes)

34. [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:17:22 -0400
Hi folks - Is it my imagination or is the response to the Orion rather subdued? Has anyone set there's down next to a 756 Pro II for A/B comp? I'd love to know any impressions about the two rigs comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00469.html (7,955 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Argo V and Carl's software for SWL (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:57:49 -0400
Argo owners - I sent back my original Argo because it did not grab me as a main rig - but it has occurred to me that it might be a pretty neat SWL rig with Carl's software and have the added benefit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00472.html (7,384 bytes)

36. Re: RE: [TenTec] limited Orion reviews? (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:49:06 -0400
Dale - I'm sure that is true - I'm one of the Omni VI owners. However, what I am curious about is comparing one 32 bit IF DSP rig to another (ie the 756 PRO II). Since TT is entering the heavy duty D
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00479.html (10,061 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Orion Reviews (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 19:22:10 -0700
money I don't often taker the bait on this reflector, but it's the above kind of remark that annoys me with this reflector. All I'm asking about is how the Orion, as a new entry into the DSP market,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00493.html (8,448 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Argo V and Carl's software for SWL (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:33:36 -0700
Thanks Bill - I appreciate the input! 73/Tim NZ7C -- Original Message -- From: "WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK" <res0wsci@verizon.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 7:51 PM Subject
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00509.html (8,619 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Confusion re Inrad filters (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:37:14 -0700
Charlie - Boy, you bet that helps - really great response and I appreciate your taking the time to clue myself and a few others in! 73/Tim NZ7C -- Original Message -- From: "Charlie Chisholm" <no7up@
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00510.html (11,063 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Orion reviews - thanks Jim & Tom (score: 1)
Author: <tlogan7@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:42:08 -0700
Tom, as well as Jim Reid - Thanks guys. Good insight from Jim on being patient and goo seat of the pants feedback re. the ProII. Tom, I'm curious - does the Prion screen seem to have better or worse
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00511.html (11,518 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu