Check this out: http://www.k9yc.com/TXNoise.pdf And lots of great stuff by Jim at: http://www.k9yc.com/publish.htm On 15-12-10 09:38 AM, Kimberly Elmore wrote: This harks back to something Rick touch
I agree Jim, these issues are very personal and what one operator finds intuitive, another may not. That is why we have many choices when it comes to radios. Personally I like the boat anchor ergonom
I disagree. The comparison is quite valid as it depends on the criteria you are comparing. In my case my shortlist of rigs was the K3, Eagle, and TS-590S. I chose the Eagle. Since then the K3S and TS
It makes no sense for RF Concepts to purchase Ten-Tec, liquidate their stock and assets, and shut down the business. When RF Concepts purchased Alpha, they reduced prices. Same tactic again? At those
I'm am also happy to see more products being developed for the amateur radio marketplace. Wow, I am amazed to see the negative comments generated by only a couple of computer generated images of a ra
Jim, Firstly, I am not an expert on the Omni VI. But I wonder if the signal you are hearing on the Omni VI frequency is not entirely what is being transmitted. Even very weak signals can be strong on
Ham A: "You are 15 Hz off frequency." Ham B: "What frequency am I on?" Ham A: "3810.015 kHz." Ham B: "That's odd, I called CQ on 3810.015 kHz and I am still transmitting on 3810.015 kHz. Must be your
There are discussions ongoing on the Ten-Tec reflectors on both yahoo groups and contesting.com about the noise blankers of the Triton IV, the Omni A/B/C, and the Corsairs. While noise blankers are b