Mail Archive Search: <+from:w6wqc@dslextreme.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w6wqc@dslextreme.com: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] for you cw guys (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:37:01 -0700; I have a question is anyone running a logikey keyer with there Orion II ? I purchased one to use with a Kenwood ts 940 and >absolutely love it . I am just wondering if it works any better than the in; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00295.html (7,997 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Please trim your replies! (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:10:25 -0800; A gentle plea for everyone to trim their replies. Amen, Kevin, amen!; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00096.html (7,125 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-VI problem (score: 1): Author: Alfred Lorona <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:18:54 -0700; By the way, 160 is the only band that I can hear a signal. I suspect the other bands must be stuck on obscure frequencies. Look for the easy thing first. Is your lock button pushed in? 73, AL; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00022.html (8,265 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:07:51 -0800; Huh? A perfect 1:1 what? Not SWR It wasn't clear but I meant a perfect 1:1 swr looking from the transmitter. Not on the line itself. The line has a high swr on some bands but the loss is minimal comp; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00007.html (8,476 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] G5RV (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:49:23 -0800; A G5RV fed with open wire feedline and a tuner will work just as well as a regularly configured G5RV. The flat top wire does the radiating and it is the same length in either configuration so the res; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00495.html (7,839 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:57:44 -0700; What is the difference between putting a remote antenna tuner at the feed point of the antenna verses at the end of the feed line like most hams have for their installation? Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00080.html (9,648 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 14:57:01 -0700; 'snip' it may be argued that the tuner at the antenna actually resonates the antenna and so improves its radiation efficiency at some cost from losses in the tuner. As Jerry points out, there are som; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00083.html (10,788 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 18:19:14 -0700; 'snip" How can a tuner at the tx end change the impedance mismatch between the feedline and the antenna into a match? Did you mean to say " a mismatch between the end of the feedline and the antenna"; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00092.html (11,834 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 20:28:49 -0700; Does coax radiate? Here is another point of confusion. Assume a properly terminated coax fed dipole. The RF travels along the surface of the inner conductor and along the inside of the shield. When t; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00099.html (10,544 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:12:27 -0700; Jim Brown wrote: 'snip' The chokes described in my "cookbook" will virtually kill common mode current. And these are multi-band solutions! You do NOT need to go to the trouble of a resonant line. I d; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00138.html (8,967 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:52:10 -0700; Zero reactance in a wire antenna feedpoint is a necessary but not sufficient condition for it to be truly resonant. Citing the Antenna Fundamentals, chap 2, page 2-1 of my 16th addition of The ARRL A; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00147.html (10,605 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:24:46 -0700; Are folks on the list still of the belief that the Omni VI+ is still the best CW rig ever made? Yes. Although I have very fond memories of the Navy RBL-7. A regenerative receiver no less! 73, AL; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00161.html (9,394 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:34:02 -0700; 'snip' is all that is required, ANY wire can be called resonant and there is nothing to distinguish such wires from a halfwave wire. When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the d; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00162.html (9,448 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:53:01 -0700; 'snip' is all that is required, ANY wire can be called resonant and there is nothing to distinguish such wires from a halfwave wire. When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the d; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00163.html (9,868 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 22:53:13 -0700; 'snip' is all that is required, ANY wire can be called resonant and there is nothing to distinguish such wires from a halfwave wire. When I wrote 'any wire' I assumed that, given the context of the d; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00164.html (9,741 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:13:38 -0700; The text is fine -- you missed an important part of the sentence -- "in the time of one RF cycle." No, I didn't miss that. read my post again. With reference to another post, I wish to add that anten; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00166.html (9,959 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ great CW rig (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:12:49 -0700; I want to investigate the feasability of using a XF-9NB 8-pole filter as a roofing filter in a Omni six plus. Does anyone know if the Inrad board, which I understand is available without a filter, ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00261.html (8,282 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:01:20 -0700; With an L network antenna tuner there are always at least two possible combinations of L and C to provide a match. Under certain conditions of the source and load impedances, there are four possible; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00331.html (10,233 bytes)
19. [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:17:16 -0700; Any complex source impedance can be matched to any complex load impedance by two L network configurations. One will be a low pass (series L and shunt C) while the other will be a high pass configurat; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00336.html (12,160 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] OT Antenna Tuners (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:29:55 -0700; Perhaps I did not state very clearly what I meant to say, however your writing seems to confirm what I meant to say. What I meant to say is that given a single configuration of L and C in an L networ; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00338.html (10,792 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]