Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8au@sssnet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8au@sssnet.com: 332 ]

Total 332 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ load (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:50:17 -0400; At 50% final amp efficiency (linear mode) plus an amp to run the ancillary circuits (counter, etc) you would be at 16 amps minimum. MeThinks the ammeter shunt needs attention. :-) Perry w8au ________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00260.html (7,964 bytes)
202. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:20:34 -0400; Let the Pundits pounce on this one! :-) Perry _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00400.html (7,632 bytes)
203. Re: [TenTec] Paragon memory loss ... (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:04:43 -0400; I've used NiMH 9V batts with good results. Theoretically longer service... w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00389.html (7,325 bytes)
204. Re: [TenTec] "here tomorrow?" (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:59:09 -0400; And don't forget (newcomers don't realize) the reason for this is that JA companies were subsidized by their government. Not an even playing field for USA. (including TT) w8au _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00452.html (9,042 bytes)
205. Re: [TenTec] Opinions from Scout Owners? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:30:06 -0400; Good choice. w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00065.html (7,080 bytes)
206. Re: [TenTec] Opinions from Scout Owners? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:18:14 -0400; Good show, Mike: BUT your Jeep symbol needs less vertical grill slots to look authentic! I'd cut it down to four. (not seven) :-) w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00084.html (8,976 bytes)
207. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:19:07 -0400; We have such short memories... It was common knowledge for years that JA manufacturers were subsidized by their government... it is most likely still that way. US mfr's are not subsidized... the only; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00178.html (8,316 bytes)
208. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:33:04 -0400; B-B-B-But Roy..... You didn't tell 'em you also use 100 Hz selectivity on your roundtable ragchews.... Fess up now... :-) Makes ur ear VERY discriminating.... :-) (I promise I won't make U try to cop; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00269.html (9,446 bytes)
209. Re: [TenTec] ***Possible Spam*** Re: Yep -- Omni VII SORRY I JUSTCAN'T TAKE ANYMORE!! (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:43:22 -0400; Aw, C'mon Larry: Anyone familiar with WU telegrams, Military messages, AP and UPI teletype news, etc knows that they were all done in CAPS. Saved using the "shift" key, and lower case was not necessa; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00321.html (9,130 bytes)
210. Re: [TenTec] ALL CAPS? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:46:11 -0400; Militarily speaking, all branches had standard typewriters and for general admin purposes they used upper and lower case, BUT not the communications branches. They knew the value of brevity and effic; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00336.html (9,719 bytes)
211. Re: [TenTec] ALL CAPS? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:07:43 -0400; Jerry: You forgot to add a "smiley face" to that question. :-) Wonder if our "seasoned editors" would recognize ...-. __ in LL Morse? (OK, in International it's ...-- --) w8au _______________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00351.html (7,959 bytes)
212. Re: [TenTec] Century 21 D (score: 1): Author: "w8au" <w8au@sssnet.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:56:16 -0400; Ralph: I know this is late, but I'm up the road in Massillon, and if the C-21 doesn't go to the first fella that answered, let me know. Tnx, Perry w8au _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-11/msg00214.html (7,042 bytes)
213. Re: [TenTec] Arrl and code (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:08:53 -0500; Nice theory, but not foolproof. The no-code license from 1992 on raised the number of new hams, but did not correspondingly increase ARRL membership. What you achieve easily does not maintain loyalty; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00339.html (7,255 bytes)
214. Re: [TenTec] Eliminating CW as a License Requirement (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:06:39 -0500; Removing the requirement should pique the interest of many, plus remove the "stubborn resistance" syndrome of those who thought they didn't like it but never experienced it. Perry w8au ______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00405.html (7,821 bytes)
215. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:01:30 -0500; 100 wpm used to be the top speed for a small percentage of the CW ops. Used to be a California based club with "star" in the name... 7 star? Had to use keyboards to send, but receive was all in the m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00492.html (8,394 bytes)
216. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:22:13 -0500; Did anyone miss the criteria for this competition? The only thing they have to receive is "call signs." No text. You know that there will be at least one number with letters before and after. This al; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00505.html (8,591 bytes)
217. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:28:22 -0500; John: Did you miss the "smiley face"? No criticism here... Since ole' Ted was the copying champ eons ago, It would be interesting to see what he might think about it. :-) ____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00516.html (8,872 bytes)
218. Re: [TenTec] "Talk Power" problem (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 17:36:01 -0500; Maybe it should be simply stated that processing allows the audio gain to be run much higher, thereby bringing up all the background noise including the amplifier blower, whether distorted or not. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00633.html (9,100 bytes)
219. Re: [TenTec] Class A (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:57:05 -0500; Maybe not "misguided," but with new HF operators coming aboard with no CW knowledge, the "investigation" of modes is thus reduced. No way to go except to try to make FONE more interesting since who c; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00121.html (8,397 bytes)
220. Re: [TenTec] code speed (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:21:57 -0500; An associate of mine who was an Army radio op during WW2 said that they occasionally signed off with "4Q." To which the other op would reply "4Q2." This upset the monitors who sent messages to all co; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00394.html (8,570 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]