Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3fiy@radioadv.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TenTec] Signal heard with AF gain at minimum (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:26:19 -0400
It is most likely due to the sensitivity of your headphones. The noise you are hearing is not the noise floor of the RX, it is the noise floor of the audio chain AFTER the volume control only. When y
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00594.html (9,664 bytes)

282. Re: [TenTec] Bezel/tuning knob question (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:12:17 -0400
That's correct Gary. The Bezel is attached to the outer shaft of the VFO which is the shaft with the lead screw that moves the core into and out of the coil. Here's how I sync the bezel and the opera
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00607.html (9,023 bytes)

283. Re: [TenTec] Bezel/tuning knob question (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:16:20 -0400
I wondered about that too Jerry, and came to the conclusion Gary was seeing the three little plastic protrusions that are melted down to hold the aluminum dial to the plastic collar that attaches to
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00608.html (9,523 bytes)

284. Re: Re: [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:37:57 -0400
On 26 Apr 2002 at 9:44, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sa wrote: In a bizzare sort of way, these negative comments can also have a positive result. Please do not read into what I am about to say that I e
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00714.html (12,665 bytes)

285. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:59:24 -0400
Although I agree in part, there are some things about a radio, or any other piece of equipment for that matter, that we just cannot put into meaningful, measurable specs. The fianl test for a radio i
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00762.html (9,461 bytes)

286. Re: [TenTec] Would like Corsair II comments (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:31:47 -0400
First of all Tim, in my mind the CorsairII is a "keeper". And I am one of those who actually like the operation of the hang AGC. I much prefer the hang action to AGC that is constantly changing the g
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00783.html (10,738 bytes)

287. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:33:12 -0400
No, I don't think that was it. We were not building guitar amps where some "fuzz" and other stuff is the norm. We were building High Fidelity amplifiers where the company officials wanted the most fa
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00784.html (10,437 bytes)

288. [TenTec] Ron Lee AGC mod for Omni (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:24:23 -0400
I have received several requests for info on the Ron Lee AGC mod. I purchased the Omni with the mod already in place many years ago. I don't know if there is any info on the Internet. All I have is s
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00786.html (7,151 bytes)

289. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Bashing/eHam Reviews (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:06:47 -0400
Good point Paul. I'm pretty sure the Pegasus and Jupiter use the phasing method of sideband generation and detection, in software of course, and at least in theory, can go down to DC response. Anothe
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00795.html (7,853 bytes)

290. (Fwd) Re: [TenTec] Ron Lee AGC (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:30:38 -0400
Thanks Barry, Looks like this matter was address before. One of these days I'm going to find the archives!!!! :-) Yes, this is a major modification and not for the faint of heart, but it does work! A
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00798.html (6,984 bytes)

291. Re: [TenTec] auto tuner (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:01:14 -0500
I sure hope it does not have an internal tuner as standard. If they want to make one available as an option, OK, but I would not use the internal tuner and I sure don't want to pay for something I wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00300.html (8,779 bytes)

292. Re: [TenTec] auto tuner (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 13:46:01 -0500
If you are referring to the internal "roofing" filters, you are quite right about not being required to buy them and that is a wonderful thing. If I am strictly a SSB operator, why would I want to bu
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00306.html (9,917 bytes)

293. Re: [TenTec] Re: Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:39:30 -0500
20 amps X 12 volts = 240 watts input. Allow for 50% efficiency more or less and you have 100 watts more or less output. -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00414.html (12,562 bytes)

294. Re: [TenTec] Re: Tuners (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 19:52:03 -0500
I agree with you Carl about this being the best protection I have seen. As far as I know, it started with the Paragon and I believe it is included in the Pegasus/Jupiter. Looking at my Jupiter schema
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00416.html (11,685 bytes)

295. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aesthetics..Another point of View (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 21:14:57 -0500
One of the areas in which the K2 does well according to test reports is phase noise. I find it interesting that the oscillator system used in the K2 is in certain ways similar to that found in the la
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00428.html (10,127 bytes)

296. Re: [TenTec] KB7OEX: a big plus favoring ORION (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:00:45 -0500
If I correctly understand the write-up released by Ten Tec, there will be no ham radio transceiver available that has better filtering than the Orion. In fact nothing will even come close. With cryst
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00546.html (13,905 bytes)

297. Re: [TenTec] Omni V vs. Headphones (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:35:22 -0500
You don't really have to get that precise. Anything from 180 ohms to 330 ohms or so will work justfine, the higher the better. -Lee
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00848.html (9,011 bytes)

298. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec] Pegasus keying...was More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:39:03 -0500
The Jupiter does have an external speaker jack even though it uses the balanced output power amplifier like the Pegasus. The sleeve of the external speaker jack is one side of the balanced circuit an
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00006.html (10,220 bytes)

299. Re: [TenTec] [Ten Tec] Pegasus keying...was More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:09:47 -0500
OK, we have established that the Pegasus [and Jupiter] sound pretty good on receive when a decent sound system is used so I decided to take a close look or, listen as the case may be, to the transmit
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00019.html (12,375 bytes)

300. [TenTec] Pegasus/Jupiter keying - In search of Perfect CW :-) (score: 1)
Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:39:39 -0500
There are [or have been] several interesting threads running which seem to be slowly converging into a good discussion of keying characteristics of Pegasus/Jupiter [PJ's for short], Omni VI+, Icom 75
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00070.html (18,068 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu