Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@fyi.net: 178 ]

Total 178 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:34:52 -0500
There's another little nasty or three going around, and once again, they are spoofing email addresses. I've had about a dozen bounced emails informing me of the virus, all allegedly coming from an al
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00844.html (8,118 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] SB200 and SB220 Differences? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:16:33 -0500
SB-200 used 572-B's & ran about 600 W max output. SB-220 used 3-500Z's & ran about 1200-1500 W max output. 73, ron wn3vaw "I'd give real money if he'd just shut up!" Dr. Leonard McCoy, "Start Trek VI
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00879.html (8,083 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Orion in CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:20:18 -0500
"But Cap'n, I canna change the laws of physics!" -- Montgomery "Scotty" Scott, Chief Engineer, USS Enterprise NCC-1701 (attributed) 73, ron wn3vaw "What's the point in being crazy if you can't have a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00040.html (9,130 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Hamfest Prize Question (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:43:16 -0500 (EST)
Hi Scott, This is kind of unofficial at the moment, but I wanted to sound you out on this before proceeding further. I've been talking with some of my club's officers about the prizes we're going to
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00078.html (9,299 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Hamfest Prize Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 02:00:00 -0500
Ah, !@@#! I sent that email from another computer (not my home one) and certainly did NOT intend for it to go to the entire list. Since I was using the web based email from my ISP and not my home ema
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00084.html (12,284 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Re: Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:49:58 -0500
Let's put things in perspective: The ban on commercially built & commercially sold amplifiers covering approximately 20 - 35 MHz (and please let's not bog down in the specific technicalities) dates b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00296.html (9,966 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Solid State Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:54:18 -0500
Actually John, the ARRL told the FCC many times before they were enacted that the amp ban was bad rule making... or to put it as bluntly as you did, stupid. But the FCC chose not to listen. They took
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00297.html (13,141 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Re: ORION headphone clicks - the fix! (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:44:53 -0500
Both in and out of contests, I've operated many PTT radios in CW mode over the years, going back to a Hot Water 100 & a modified Hallicrafters HT-37. I've also operated, both in and out of contests,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01268.html (9,171 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Power Mite Odyssey (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:42:32 -0500
John, Great story! With your permission, I'd like to use it in the December edition of my club newsletter. 73, ron wn3vaw "People hear what they want to hear, And Disregard the Rest..." "The Boxer,"
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00266.html (8,493 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:10:09 -0500
Billy, The key words are "substantial funding" in the post. Now exactly how much is considered substantial? Actually, I think someone could write a good post (or article) explaining how certain DXped
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00403.html (11,733 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:38 -0500
Ken asks, why would Ten Tec be low rated? Because the simple fact is that based on market share, ie sold equipment over the last 15 years or so, and allowing for dead, unused, and shelved rigs, Ten T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00422.html (10,958 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:50:00 -0500
Ummm, Rob, I would honestly wonder about that. I suspect that within a few minutes, the operators would become accustomed enough to the Orion that it wouldn't be a problem, especially if they are sem
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00466.html (11,275 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] 7800 purchases (was Orion in contests) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:08:52 -0500
Adam, I found logic with all of your statements... except one. How do you know the Orion is locked out of these markets? Or to put it another way, just because the firmware available to us is alleged
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00513.html (12,818 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] how does the orion sweep like the JUP ? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:30:33 -0500
If it's not "continuous," it's at least a few times per second. At least that's what I've observed on W3WH's Orion. 73, ron wn3vaw "What's the point in being crazy if you can't have a little fun with
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00763.html (11,003 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:42:34 -0400
I don't get it. The overwhelming vast majorityh original Orion group decides it's time to return to the main fold, so to speak, so that we're all in on the goings on with the Orion... and now we have
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00094.html (9,976 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:45:27 -0400
If we're going to split hairs on the difference between a "reflector" and a "discussion group," then I ask you, how many Angels can dance on the head of a pin? (Answer is: Depends on the size of both
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00095.html (11,127 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:11:43 -0400
But why start a "new" group? If you can really make a legitimate case for it, why not reactivate the original Orion group? (It hasn't been deleted, merely deactivated, it can be reactivated in second
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00112.html (13,420 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:53:19 -0400
The key question has yet to be answered: Is there truly a need for a separate group for the Orion? Look, there are often good reasons to set up a new group on Yahoo! or elsewhere. I ran into that sit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00117.html (10,645 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] New group for Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:23:53 -0400
Yes we did. Someone else's wounded ego demands the group be resurrected. So it goes. 73, ron wn3vaw 46th Annual Pennsylvania QSO Party October 11 & 12! www.nittany-arc.org/paqso.html Look for N3SH -
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00153.html (12,296 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] TenTec] Observations on my Orion (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:46:51 -0400
Joe: SDR: Software Defined Radio AC5OG: Gerald F. Youngblood, 8900 Marybank Dr, Austin TX 78750 -- Extra Class, previously KE5OH, as per RAC CD-ROM (and not even the current one). 73, ron wn3vaw 46th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00167.html (9,552 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu