Mail Archive Search: <+from:wo8l@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wo8l@aol.com: 104 ]

Total 104 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Ten Tec Jupiter on PSK31 (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:47:58 -0500; Anybody using the Jupiter on PSK with just the Ten Tec supplied chord directly to the computer sound card with no TNC? Does this really work?? What settings on the rig are appropriate? Thanks, Rick W; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-02/msg00277.html (7,411 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] Omni-VI plus question (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:54:47 -0500; Henry, As far as I know, the firmware version doesn't make any difference. It's an OMNI VI Plus.? I've never heard anybody ask about firmware versions before and I've had OMNI VI Plus rigs for 15 or; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00148.html (8,544 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] Ford vehicle RF noise. (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:12:17 -0400; Interesting. I have two ancient Ford Escorts with way over 100,000 miles on them, a Ford Focus with 50,000 and a Ford Ranger with 5,000 on it. Prior to that, I have owned a Ford Fairmont and various; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00056.html (13,436 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] Ford vehicle RF noise. (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:17:04 -0400; I don't understand this entire thread. Now people are parnoid that they have a Ford where they need to drop the gas tank or do something else drastic to fix RFI problems. Again, I've had eight or nin; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00162.html (9,438 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Jupiter and PSK (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:24:33 -0400; Hi, Anybody running PSK with a Jupiter and no interface? How do you connect? Thanks, Rick WO8L ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00029.html (6,800 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Jupiter on 10 Meter FM (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:14:05 -0400; Hi, I know there is no PL tone routine provided in the Jupiter.? However, I think it does work split FM.? Anybody ever worked any repeaters this way. Thanks, WO8L North Carolina _____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00272.html (6,912 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:01:53 -0400; Hi, The idea of opening up software to any and all comers is a little scary.? First, in today's digital communications world, if?a company doesn't own and control the software, then what do you own??; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00328.html (8,962 bytes)
88. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:48:23 -0400; Hi, Who in the world buys a consumer good, takes it apart and modifies or fixes it?? What?? Maybe .0001 per cent of the buyers worldwide?? If the thing breaks, you throw it away or give it to a chari; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00351.html (15,850 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] Technical Correspondence (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:34:02 -0400; Hi Again, In the end, the issue is this. Should people have the freedom to modify all code in a good fasion or bad fashion at random?? Who decides what's good or what's bad.??Can the?modified program; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00352.html (16,056 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Ten Tec/Elecraft/Etc. (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:07:14 -0400; To All on the Ten Tec Reflector, I have read the recent postings about the Orion 2 software upgrade, the OMNI VII and even the new Elecraft K3. Its the search for the perfect rig. So, Ive got to come; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00040.html (9,251 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion? (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:03:57 -0400; To All on the Ten Tec Reflector, I have read the recent postings about the Orion 2 software upgrade, the OMNI VII and even the new Elecraft K3. Its the search for the perfect rig. So, Ive got to come; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00041.html (12,457 bytes)
92. [TenTec] Software Upgrade (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:08:36 -0400; Interesting comments about the software upgrade. My radio requires no upgrades, although the two tin cans rust and the string needs replaced once in a while, but it gets point-to-point. Also, the bee; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00252.html (6,983 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] CW Tuning with Omni 6 Plus (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:55:05 -0400; Hi, Weird. I tune my OMNI VI Plus so that I'm on the same frequency as the station I want to work. Just tune the main tuning knob and listen. When there, then I transmit. Works every time and has; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00528.html (8,956 bytes)
94. [TenTec] Microphones (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:03:08 -0400; Does a Heil mic make that much difference over the Ten Tec mics? 73s, Rick WO8L Brrr, cold in North Carolina ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers fr; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00232.html (6,892 bytes)
95. [TenTec] S-Meters (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:18:48 -0500; Hi, Since the whole concept of RST is pretty theoretical, what's the different how an S-meter performs? I've been a ham for 35 or 40 years and my 579 to station is not some other ham's 579 to a stati; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00184.html (7,453 bytes)
96. [TenTec] E-QSLs (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:26:00 -0400; Hi, Yes, the ARRL needs to charge for awards to meet their expenses. That's resonable. However, the low response rate via LOTW is certainly at least partially due to the fact it's not flexible or use; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00348.html (7,568 bytes)
97. [TenTec] LOTW (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:01:39 -0400; Hello Again, N4PY mentioned that his response rate might be fairly low because he has a lot of older QSOs posted. In my personal experience, I like E-QSL because I'm constantly amazed how I get a QSL; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00349.html (7,476 bytes)
98. [TenTec] DSP on the Jupiter (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:36:12 -0400; Hi All, What does the DSP noise reduction sound like on the Jupiter? I'd like to pick up a used or even new Jupiter but I've never heard the DSP noise reduction. At the Ten Tec factory, I played with; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00535.html (8,394 bytes)
99. Re: [TenTec] Lousy eHam review (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:11:33 -0400; Hi, I hope the guy who wrote the review will take my e-mail address and sell me the rig for $100. 73s, Rick --Original Message-- From: John Rippey <jrippey@3n.net> To: tentec@contesting.com Sent: Sat; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00075.html (8,827 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ on it's way (score: 1): Author: wo8l@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:51:28 -0400; I have both an OMNI VI Plus and a Kenwood 570. When it comes to adjacent signals, forget it. The 570 is far inferior to the Ten Tec. When it comes to separating close signals, the OMNI is totally bet; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00156.html (10,862 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]