- 1. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: ki6pr@elite.net (Mike Siegel)
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 10:37:37 -0800
- A fair number of the responses I got to my first posting were centered on telling me why a new CW-only rig couldn't be built. And a few were even busy telling me that SOMEONE ELSE was building such a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00142.html (8,282 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin)
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:01:33 -0600
- I'm not inclined to agree. I think the generated interest in the mode would be pretty slight. Too slight for most manufacturers to give a CW optimized radio as you would like to see more than a seco
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00143.html (9,064 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 16:10:54 -0500
- About six months ago, someone on the list commented that the roofing filter in the Omni VI+ was a compromise - it was made wide enough for FM mode, and that the Omni's blocking dynamic range suffere
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00144.html (8,151 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
- Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 15:31:27 -0800
- In reading through the postings and discussions and being an Omni VI+ owner, it seems to me that the readers have not disclosed the true hidden requirements. I project that the needs are a $500 CW on
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00145.html (11,557 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons)
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:22:37 -0700
- Bob, the PatComm PC-500 is under $500 and is optimized for CW. It even has a keyboard connection for CW. It does also does SSB so the crystal filter is wide. It has a narrow filter for CW but that is
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00147.html (10,263 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: dufferjames@hotmail.com (James Duffer)
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 06:15:24 -0600
- <html><DIV> <P><BR><BR></P></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV>>From: "Mike Siegel" <KI6PR@ELITE.NET> <DIV></DIV>>To: <TENTEC@CONTESTING.COM> <DIV></DIV>>Subject: [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig To: <tentec@cont
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00168.html (9,337 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:53:15 -0800
- I don't think a CW-only super rig like that would be a big seller, therefore manufacturers would shy away from such a project. With the influx of all the "pretend Hams" coming into our ranks, the 5 W
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00184.html (9,362 bytes)
- 8. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: gctotten@juno.com (Gerald C Totten)
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 13:02:56 -0500
- As a dedicated CW man, I doubt I would buy a CW only rig. I had a Century 21 and a Century 22 and although I loved them, I got rid of them. Just buy an OMNI 6+ and make a few changes. Like, put a cov
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00189.html (7,741 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: SEWATKINS@dgs.state.va.us (Sherrill WATKINS)
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 13:31:42 -0500
- Jerry: If you liked your Century 21 and 22 rigs why did you sell them??- Corn - k4own. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests:
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00191.html (7,467 bytes)
- 10. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1)
- Author: gctotten@juno.com (Gerald C Totten)
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:35:00 -0500
- Sherrill, I probably sold the Century 21 and 22 because I'd wanted to listen to an SSB net or 160 meters and did not want to be switching rigs all the time. If I had the room and the money, I would s
- /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00199.html (7,950 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu