Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+and\s+Corsair\s+II\s+receive\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+and\s+Corsair\s+II\s+receive\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: tlogan7@cox.net (tlogan7@cox.net); Date: Sun Feb 2 10:59:05 2003; One of my thoughts in giving a Corsair II a trial run was that it did not have DSP or a PLL and was almost a 1/3 less in cost than a used Omni VI+. I had the impresseion that some people's experience; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00050.html (7,740 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: AB9M@aol.com (AB9M@aol.com); Date: Sun Feb 2 11:47:19 2003; I have both a Corsair II w/ external VFO (last production run) and an OMNI VI+. They are very close as receivers although how they achieve the sensitivity, selectivity, in large signal environments i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00051.html (9,019 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Sun Feb 2 13:09:34 2003; With respect to the Omni VI+, AB9M mentioned "TenTec for that reason provides narrow roofing filters in the first IF. With the 500 Hz or more likely the 250 Hz filters selected" I don't think it's qu; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00053.html (7,796 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun Feb 2 13:45:58 2003; Tim: Actually the opposite. The Paragon uses several PLL's but the Omni VI+ is crystal mixing. It has the lowest noise of any of them. The DSP does a wonderful job of noise reduction and killing hete; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00057.html (8,937 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sun Feb 2 16:56:37 2003; The tunable oscillator of the Omni V and VI is synthesized, at VHF, then divided down to reduce the phase noise from its PLL. Then it uses crystal mixing for the various bands. 73, Jerry, K0CQ -- Ent; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00066.html (7,523 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: AB9M@aol.com (AB9M@aol.com); Date: Sun Feb 2 17:54:46 2003; You are correct, its not quite right to call them roofing filters, but the resulting bandwidth selectivity allows the desired in band (250 Hz or 500 Hz wide) signal to pass though an amplification st; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00071.html (8,847 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni VI+ and Corsair II receive (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Mon Feb 3 01:15:48 2003; Hi Tim - My solution, have one of each. I still like the Corsair II for some things, but I use the OMNI VI more often because it is simply more stable. Heck, I prefer my TS 850 for most SSB exploits,; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00104.html (8,627 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]