Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+I\s+evaluation\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+I\s+evaluation\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Paragon I evaluation? (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 20:45:42 -0800; Anyone have the Paragon and can compare it to the Corsair II and/or OMNI VI (or OMNI V)? I like both SSB and CW operation, and am not a contest operator. I like to SWL too. I would put a CW filter in; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00020.html (7,855 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon I evaluation? (score: 1): Author: weingaertner@nac.net (Robert Weingaertner); Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 11:30:05 -0500; I have had a Paragon I for several years, and the only major problem with the Paragon I is the solder on the two PLL boards. Some were made with poor solder joints which become intermittent after a f; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00027.html (9,505 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Paragon I evaluation? (score: 1): Author: rmccabe@dwx.com (Rich McCabe); Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 12:11:18 -0600; Hello Clark, I can not give you any first hand experience on direct comparisons. I have owned two Paragons, the last having the Giehl chip Bob mentioned. From a reliability standpoint I have had no p; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00029.html (11,822 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Paragon I evaluation? (score: 1): Author: w8hvx@ismi.net (Bill Lewis); Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 13:49:42 -0500; Hello Clark, I have both a Paragon I and an Omni 6, opt 001 on my operating desk. I have been very pleased with both rigs as well as TenTec service. Both units were bought used. During my ownership,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00030.html (8,575 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]