Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Reply\s+to\s+N1EU\s+\/\s+Barry\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Reply\s+to\s+N1EU\s+\/\s+Barry\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Reply to N1EU / Barry (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:56:31 EST; Thanks, That was the info I was looking for. I feel the 6+ is engineered more with the CW op in mind than the SSB op, but I'm embarrassed to say that my backup rig, which is a cheap Alinco DX70T with; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00903.html (6,615 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Reply to N1EU / Barry (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:41:47 -0600; How about just doing the $15 INRAD mod that doesn't involve filter changes, but tries to eliminate some of the passband ripple? I have the kit, but haven't installed it yet. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, A; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00907.html (7,971 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Reply to N1EU / Barry (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:36:23 -0500; here run 2.3kc followed by a 2.1kc, both 8 pole and it makes a big difference on crowded band. for CW, which is 99% of activity, the 2.1 follows a .300 or a .500 and believe it ot not makes a big dif; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00914.html (8,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]