Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Status\s+of\s+New\s+Display\s+Board\s+for\s+OMNI\s+VII\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:19:51 -0400
Does anyone know the status the new display board that is coming out for the OMNI VII and ORION II? I saw a prototype at Dayton and was assured that it was ready for production. This board will allow
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00273.html (7,592 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: Mike Christiansen <starmike@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:29:43 -0400
Check this link at the Tentec site. it should answer your questions http://radio.tentec.com/status/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00274.html (7,964 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:40:06 -0400
Thanks, Mike. If this is not an old, not-updated post, I was lied to at Dayton. I was shown a prototype board and was told it was ready for production. In fact, I was told that the week after Dayton
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00275.html (10,234 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:42:58 -0400
Make that "live sighting . . ." :-( _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00276.html (10,996 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "george" <goofyham@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:45:42 -0400
What, $300.00 for the board that supports real time spectrum scope for the O2? Doesn't that seem kinda high? George W2YJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00277.html (7,540 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: Mike Christiansen <starmike@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:01:51 -0400
Carl, that is a brand new webpage the Tentec just put up last week, so the information IMO is current. This may not be the news your friend was hoping for Mike, N4GW _________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00278.html (11,516 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Art Roberts W5AER" <w5aer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:07:29 -0500
An email to Scott (Production Mgr) at sales@tentec.com would be the info from the top. 73 Art W5AER -- 73 Art W5AER Houston (we have a problem) _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00279.html (12,181 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:44:55 -0400
Well, Mike, this is most distressing. My friend is going to be furious. I'm a little upset myself, because I was told by the engineer responsible for the board that the one he had at Dayton was final
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00283.html (13,736 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: Mike Christiansen <starmike@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:55:02 -0400
I agree Carl, is has taken a long time for the High sweep board to come to pass. I have an Orion II and I would like to see it as well. It is still the best radio I have ever owned, but it could use
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00284.html (15,381 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:07:23 -0500
Carl, Regarding the discussion you had with the engineer at Dayton, I also had a similar chat, except it was the firmware that was ready for release, and the hardware sweep card still had a couple of
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00286.html (15,708 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Frank Holladay" <holladayfd@multipro.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:39:46 -0500
Duane, I attended an engineering seminar several years ago at which the principal speaker was head of the industrial engineering department of a major southern university. He told us his definition o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00289.html (17,410 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:44:47 -0400
E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10490e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00290.html (13,522 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:24:53 -0700
Any chance you can post that photo? Ron N6IE www.N6IE.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00292.html (15,418 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: starmike@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:46:12 +0000
John, It is almost real time, but defintiely not high speed. Mike, N4GW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00293.html (14,624 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:55:10 -0700
Carl, The web page announcements show a major introduction in Sept. That is not inconsistent with what you found out at Dayton. The development cycle from a working prototype to a production mode via
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00301.html (9,180 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Steen" <n2gff@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:30:08 -0700
Such impatience! When is the last time Kenwood, Yaesu, or Icom EVER listened to your needs and said "We can do that!". NEVER happens. There is nothing inherently wrong with the OMNIVII or the Orion I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00304.html (17,210 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:29:23 -0400
Stuart, September would be consistent with what I was told at Dayton, but the statement referred to earlier in this thread was worded as though the announcement was not anytime soon. Where is the ann
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00305.html (10,489 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:37:34 -0400
Duane, The engineer I talked with was not there on Friday but came in on Saturday. He was the guy who actually worked on the board, so he was on top of the issue, at least from an engineering standpo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00306.html (18,861 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: wo8l@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:56:25 -0400
After reading all of these posts and if somebody has a really?disappointed view of Ten Tec and wants to get rid of their equipment, I'd be interested in a 565 or an OMNI VII or an Orion II. Since som
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00311.html (10,613 bytes)

20. [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "fraz1" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:40:35 -0500
Stuart....help me , please. I'm not seeing what you saw? I see the note regarding the Orion and Orion II, but I see no major release for the Omni VII? 73 John K4NP ___________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00312.html (6,989 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu