Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Why\s+not\s+rig\s+in\s+the\s+middle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Why\s+not\s+rig\s+in\s+the\s+middle\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Why not rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: n2ka@juno.com (Arthur R Bernstein); Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 02:33:20 EDT; Boys and Girls, let's face the facts of ham radio life (and business life in general.) It's all well and nice to beg TenTec to come out with a mid priced midfeatured radio. You think startup costs to; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00159.html (8,494 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Why not rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: joentam@transend.com.tw (JOE and TAM BV/N0IAT); Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 15:50:04 +0800 (CST); Art, Certainly your note points out the facts of "the economics of ham radio". Some could also argue that the point of our posts was merely fun and not a call to action for tentec to begin production; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00160.html (8,498 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Why not rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 12:03:18 -0400; Right on Art! I am the person who instigateed this post, more for fun and to bring some "FREE" idea bouncing from the ops that know what they want to the Guys at Ten Tec. However, I can see some very; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00161.html (9,288 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Why not rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: jkoppi@pclink.com (Joseph Koppi); Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 12:38:47 -0600; What an interesting discussion this is! I read with interest the comments of Art, N2KA, as he reminds us of the realities of life. I quite agree. He's right when he says most hams turn their noses up; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00162.html (8,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]