Mail Archive Search: <+from:Dinsterdog@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Dinsterdog@aol.com: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M EU Opening 20 Dec 01 (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:55:24 EST; Here is my 160M log from 20 Dec 2001: 0422: DJ0MDR 559 0529: CT1CJJ 559 0650: DF2PY 559 0709: G3PQA 569 0712: GW3KGV 559 None of this few seconds of grayline stuff, it was a sustrained opening It was; /archives//html/Topband/2001-12/msg00076.html (7,694 bytes)
2. Topband: EU topband condx from W7 12-26-01 (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 09:14:18 EST; I heard several EU stations calling that were getting reports from the east coast as being 559-599. Most heard in Wyoming were just above the noise but copiable including OZ1DD, UX0ZZ,.HA0DU. Problem; /archives//html/Topband/2001-12/msg00111.html (7,360 bytes)
3. Topband: 160M results 28 Dec from N0AH (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:45:01 EST; Comparing aurora oval photos between the 27th and 28th, it seemed the pattern was very similar, with a little less intensity on the 28th, so I thought last night would be another good opening- But af; /archives//html/Topband/2001-12/msg00161.html (7,333 bytes)
4. Topband: 160 this morning (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:47:58 EST; 9V1PC had a great signal on 80 meters this morning at around 13:00Z then QSY'ed to 1.824.5MHz at around 13:45Z, 20minutes too late for us here in SE Wyoming.Did anyone work Peter this morning from st; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00011.html (7,216 bytes)
5. Topband: unexpected cndx (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:08:10 EST; I listened to DF2PY for almost 1/2 an hour last night. On my NE Beverage, for several minutes, he was as good of a copy as a few east coast stations that worked him- It was a very sustained opening,; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00030.html (7,098 bytes)
6. Topband: EU again in W7 from N0AH (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 02:27:28 EDT; DF2PY last month was not as rare as I thought it would be to get into EU this season With a K=4 and a A=34, and a SF=201, the topband was a lot quiter than 80 meters tonight. Quiet enough to work GM3; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00006.html (7,554 bytes)
7. Topband: phased vertical question (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:24:32 EDT; I have my Inv L on a 75 foot tower. About 400 feet from this tower to the south, I have a 65 foot tower supporting a 1/2 wave 4SQR 40 meter dipole array. If I take and put an Inv L on this tower, and; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00012.html (6,936 bytes)
8. Topband: VR2MY and 160 from N0AH (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 21:57:09 EDT; I had a nice conversation with Yul, VR2MY, on 10 meters 6 Oct 01 about his low band activities as he was recently heard and worked on the west coast on 80 meters. He told me all he has for an antenna; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00020.html (7,094 bytes)
9. Topband: follow up on VR2MY on Topband (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 23:23:01 EDT; I had a chance to visit with Yul one last time tonight before 10 meters droped out after I posted my first comments on his situation. He told me that he is using a 65 foot sloper of the top of a 3 st; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00022.html (7,471 bytes)
10. Topband: T32EQ Classic Case of 160 Grayline (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 17:51:01 EDT; I was up this morning listening for either T32 or 3D2 at around 0930. From earlier posts, I saw that I had missed the 3D2 operation earlier at what seemed around thier sunset, and I saw the post at 0; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00037.html (9,471 bytes)
11. Topband: 160M Band Plan questions (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:54:55 EDT; I was listening to a station work 9M2AX this morning on CW, then switch to SSB on the same frequency, around 1.832MHz where he asked the station to move up to 1.843MHz for SSB QSO's...a nice gesture; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00142.html (10,555 bytes)
12. Topband: CQWW DX SSB and 160 Meter Band Plan - K4ZDH's Response (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:16:55 EDT; Is K4ZDH stating he is going to allow this or not? It seemed like a pretty basic question. My guess is that if you operate below 1.843MHz, you can always use the arguement that you were looking for a; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00167.html (10,034 bytes)
13. Topband: T88ZY this morning (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:39:39 EDT; Did anyone get through this morning?? I listened to T88ZY from around 12:45Z to 13:18Z this morning......he really came up around 13:10, just before the solar disk broke the horizon, but no luck even; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00205.html (7,305 bytes)
14. Topband: K3J (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:46:32 EDT; Sept 16, 2001 Heard K3J for 10 minutes from 1328-1338Z, on 1.824, almost an hour past our sunrise and the only time I've heard them from here- 1.827 here has a mild carrier on it so this was a decent; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00071.html (7,069 bytes)
15. Topband: Listening to an electric fence.... (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:56:22 EDT; discharge off of anything wet touching them and the ground. The click you hear is the fence discharging it's stored electricity.....the interval's depend on the fence- and how fast the electric fenc; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00113.html (8,102 bytes)
16. Topband: EU Condx fto Wyo 25 Sept 2001 (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:57:15 EDT; EU returns to W7: I was able to work DF2PY from Wyoming at 05:01Z on 1.834.4MHz last night with his signal report a solid 559 for a few brief minutes then back into the noise as we gave a few reports; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00137.html (8,037 bytes)
17. Topband: questions on Slopers (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:41:36 +0100; I have a 75 foot tower that I have used an Inv L on in the past. But since I now have a stack of antennas on the tower, the Inv L is in the way. I have 90 1/4 wave radials on the the ground. My quest; /archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00086.html (7,656 bytes)
18. Topband: 1/4 sloper responses (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:10:13 EDT; Thanks to everyone for the suggestions on my sloper questions. There are a lot of emails I've gotten directly back directly as well on the reflector............ Most told me that at the height of my; /archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00091.html (9,493 bytes)
19. Topband: Antennas (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:01:07 EDT; I have four real world observations about using top loaded vertical antennas I'd like share regarding W7IUV's questions These are based upon my 4 rebuilds of my 80 meter 4SQR vertical array made out; /archives//html/Topband/2001-08/msg00120.html (10,938 bytes)
20. Topband: ZK1NJC from Wyoming (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 01:11:23 EST; Was a excellent copy here in Wyoming at 05:46Z and building louder at 06:05Z on 1.832.5 working up 5, but I could only copy him on the VK beveragePatient op, he stood by for my call on several attemp; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00022.html (7,064 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]