Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:donovanf@starpower.net: 460 ]

Total 460 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: Measured RG-6 Loss: Solid Copper vs. Copper Clad center conductor (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:10:33 -0500 (EST)
Hi Doug, Quad shielded RG-6 with a copper clad steel center conductor is an excellent choice on 160 and 80 meters as long as the cable lengths aren't very long. Outdoor rated quad shielded CCS RG-6 i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00179.html (10,376 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: Measured RG-6 Loss: Solid Copper vs. Copper Clad center conductor (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:26:39 -0500 (EST)
Several topbanders asked if I would measure the DC resistance of the solid copper and copper clad steel center conductors of the RG-6 coax for which I published the RF loss measurements. I also measu
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00187.html (10,978 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: Measured RG-6 Loss: Solid Copper vs. Copper Clad center conductor (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:23:50 -0500 (EST)
Uli, A very important lesson about CCS RG-6 has been communicated to topbanders by you and several others who have had bad experiences. Thanks for taking the time to describe your unfortunate experie
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00197.html (14,440 bytes)

84. Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 12:00:34 -0500 (EST)
My new 160 meter Broad Side - End Fire (BSEF) receiving array is now in use and performing extremely well, significantly better than my 900 foot Beverages and full size 4-square transmitting antenna.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00004.html (7,359 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 14:57:16 -0500 (EST)
Hi Larry, Your 160 meter CW skimmer is working extremely well, it spotted T6LG last night. No other U.S. skimmer spotted him! I couldn't hear any trace of T6LG, I guess I need to move my BSEF receivi
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00007.html (10,990 bytes)

86. Topband: Subject:RE: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:38:14 -0500 (EST)
Hi Ron, Construction of a phase inversion transformer is covered in detail on page 23 of the excellent paper published by W5ZN and N4HY: http://www.w5zn.org/files/Design%20Construction%20&%20Evaluati
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00008.html (8,767 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:39:48 -0500 (EST)
Hi Don, Thanks for your email, I'll try to answer your questions as best as I can. In W8JI's very rural area minimum main lobe beamwidth is more valuable to him than minimum sidelobes. Tom's choice o
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00010.html (12,828 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:46:51 -0500 (EST)
Hi Larry, There isn't much difference between 70 foot and 130 foot end-fire spacing. If there isn't any other consideration, 130 feet is probably the better choice. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original message
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00011.html (13,411 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:08:23 -0500 (EST)
Hi Tom, You've surely built and evaluated more BSEF and 8-circle receiving arrays than any of the rest of us. I'm very new to them and after just a few days of evaluation I'm delighted with the resul
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00014.html (15,893 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:20:58 -0500 (EST)
Hi Joel, Other than the three Magic T's, what other specific mods have you made to your 8-circles? Adding a T50-2 toroidal inductor and a BNC connector at the 50 ohm tap makes a quick job of adjustin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00019.html (12,050 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: Subject:RE: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:00:31 -0500 (EST)
Hi Carl, I and many others have been using Fair-rite 2873000202 binocular cores with excellent success for years now. http://www.newark.com/fair-rite/2873000202/ferrite-core-cylindrical/dp/02E8908 Us
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00021.html (13,983 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:14:53 -0500 (EST)
Hi Lee, Since I have two excellent receiving antennas to compare with (a 900 foot Beverage and a full size 4-square), I'm satisfied that I'm getting the expected performance from my BSEF receiving ar
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00023.html (12,257 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:53:14 -0500 (EST)
Hi Lee, You can save yourself lots of engineering effort if you simply make yourself a copy of this one: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=40+43+24+n,+141+19+44+e&hl=en&ll=40.72308,141.328892&spn=0.0033
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00030.html (13,652 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:36:39 -0500 (EST)
Hi Gary, The University of Illinois research array in Bondville, Illinois was unique, it used one hundred elements distributed equally around a 1000 foot diameter circle. It was the first Wullenweber
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00046.html (20,741 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:39:51 -0500 (EST)
Hi Lee, In an earlier post, W8JI stated that the "Wullenwever antenna was never a low-noise high performance antenna." Certainly that was true of the World War II-era German Wullenwever, but the 1960
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00052.html (13,820 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:09:53 -0500 (EST)
Hi Peter, Gablingen Kaserne looks abandoned, there's not a single car in the parking lot! Not like in the "good old days" of the cold war in the 1970s and 1980s... http://www.amerika-in-augsburg.de/i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00053.html (18,002 bytes)

97. Re: Topband: Price of Copper Going Up (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 09:18:04 -0500 (EST)
Despite the high cost of copper, there are still affordable sources of copper radial wire. For example, 16 AWG speaker wire can be purchased on eBay for $52.25 per one thousand feet including shippin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00060.html (8,498 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: Price of Copper Going Up (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:01:43 -0500 (EST)
Hi Jeff, Thanks for pointing that out. I'm sure 60% copper clad aluminum will work just as well as copper radials. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original message -- _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00067.html (10,748 bytes)

99. Topband: Fifty low power sealed SPDT RF relays for five bucks! (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 01:58:53 -0500 (EST)
The web site is a little confusing about the quantity, but the deal is for fifty (50) sealed SPDT low power RF relays http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G16510B gold contacts 2
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00092.html (7,402 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:41:07 -0500 (EST)
Hi Bruce, I'm not aware of any reason why eight Magic-T splitters couldn't be added to an 8-circle BSEF array to enable installation of a second azimuth switch. My 160 meter BSEF array has plenty of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00130.html (16,212 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu