- 1. Re: Topband: Sharing radials?? (score: 1)
- Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 8:38:13 -0700
- As the purpose of radials is to minimize current into the ground, a neighboring radial system will help. I saw this when doing some work at K6KM's QTH. We had an elevated 80m wire half wave vertical
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00131.html (6,925 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Topband antenna for 1-men-show in HB0 January 2007 (score: 1)
- Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:53:39 -0700
- Elevated 4-7m would be better, if you can put up resonant radials. wire length of 400m/1200ft ? Go to http://www.ncjweb.com/k3lcmaxgainradials.pdf for an article that calculates the correct numer an
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00183.html (7,413 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Short Radials / Antenna Update (score: 1)
- Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:09:57 -0800
- Inverted-L antennas have a high angle component! So the close-in vs. far-out performance is as expected. The only way to get rid of the high angle component is to make the elements T-tops's (or some
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00187.html (7,280 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Twin Lead (Speaker Wire) Loss? (score: 1)
- Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:02:06 -0800
- In our ever growing quest lighten the weight on DXpedition luggage, I'm looking for an alternative feed line for RX antennas. Does anyone have data on the impedance and line loss of twin lead (speake
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00189.html (6,977 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: 160m T-loaded vertical antenna (score: 1)
- Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 10:13:57 -0700
- Hello Jo, Congratulations on your new antenna. N6BT, KE7X and I installed a very similar antenna for the 2007 CQWWCW contest in C6A (C6ARR on 160m). It should be a very good antenna for you. Our inst
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00067.html (10,885 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu