- 1. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 157, Issue 54 (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Irizarry <michael.irizarry29@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 03:50:57 -0600
- Good morning. Mainly just a reader of this groups postings because my experience with 160M is a drop in the bucket relative to the collective experience of the members of this group. I'm a newbie for
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00647.html (23,829 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 160, Issue 25 (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Irizarry <michael.irizarry29@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:49:36 -0500
- For what it is worth, I have a Pixel up and running and several 200 foot terminated bogs. The Pixel is not a bad antenna but it will not beat a properly cut and terminated BOG on 160M. My Pixel has b
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00156.html (18,241 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 167, Issue 25 (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Irizarry <michael.irizarry29@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:46:54 -0600
- I had one that stopped working. Turns out the lawn guy severed the rg6 feeding the unit. Took me a bit to find it because after he cut the rg6 he buried it. Other than that, i have had not problems w
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00150.html (9,139 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 194, Issue 21 (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Irizarry <michael.irizarry29@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:26:28 -0600
- I have the DX engineering 4-square receive array configured 80 foot spacing. One of the elements is within 3 feet of a tree. I'm sure there is some impact but the antenna performs well. I have had th
- /archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00197.html (47,405 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu