Mail Archive Search: <+from:mstangelo@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:mstangelo@comcast.net: 160 ]

Total 160 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: Evolution (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:34:50 +0000 (UTC); There is an Experimenter bacnd around 137kHz - 2200 Meters I guess this would be the Tip Top band. Mike N2MS -- Original Message -- From: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net> To: k1fz@myfairpo; /archives//html/Topband/2015-11/msg00132.html (7,951 bytes)
102. Re: Topband: Weatherproofing F-type connectors (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:14:22 +0000 (UTC); Larry, My cable company recently replaced the coax to my house. The Compression type F connector they used had an additional rubber gasket on the front so that it would make a watertight seal to the; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00248.html (9,239 bytes)
103. Topband: F-type connectors transmitting question (score: 1): Author: "Michael St. Angelo" <mstangelo@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:08:48 -0500; I acquired some Commsphere Flooded F-11 type coax. I installed compression Type UHF connectors on the coax. I solder the copperclad center conductor to the center pin. The shield braid is connected v; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00275.html (6,869 bytes)
104. Re: Topband: F-type connectors transmitting question (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:22:39 +0000 (UTC); Gary, Tom, Thanks for the information. I will stick with the compression UHF connectors. F11 will handle at least 3 kW outside in the air. Don't worry about the braid. The foil plus braid is good eno; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00286.html (7,738 bytes)
105. Re: Topband: re topband QRP (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:24:42 +0000 (UTC); Robb, I operate QRP and normally give out that information as well as my power levels after the signal report. Mike N2MS -- Original Message -- From: Robb Webb Proprietor of Robb Webb Photography <ro; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00369.html (8,447 bytes)
106. Re: Topband: re topband QRP (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:39:22 +0000 (UTC); Jim, I disagree. Since it is a category I find that some operators appreciate the information. It sometimes leads to a discussion about our setups. With regards to miscopying someone. If you cannot i; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00379.html (8,993 bytes)
107. Re: Topband: re topband QRP (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:25:03 +0000 (UTC); Tom, I never sign callsign/QRP. Information about your power level is not junk. It is information about a contest category. What is junk is the erroneous 59 or 599 signal reports during mist other co; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00382.html (8,652 bytes)
108. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: "Michael St. Angelo" <mstangelo@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:54:43 -0500; The Stew Perry contest is one of the better ones but I agree with Larry and Joe. Contests tend to take over the band and interferes with other form of operation such as DX'ing, QRP and probably Digit; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00046.html (8,936 bytes)
109. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 22:31:11 +0000 (UTC); Tree, The contests may operate 10 nights a year but those nights are usually weekend when I, as well as others, have time to operate on the Topband. Why not take advantage of the unused nights and sc; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00059.html (9,115 bytes)
110. Re: Topband: K1BB (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:35:27 +0000 (UTC); Tree, That was a very interesting article in 73 about Stew Perry. They discussed the WARC bands. I remember when they were announced but I don't recall the proposal to expand the 160 meter band to 17; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00103.html (8,073 bytes)
111. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:20:48 +0000 (UTC); I agree. This is my biggest gripe about contests, meaningless signal reports. You hear SIG 599 PSE RPT. Any data sent which does not convey information is noise. This turns off hams, and more importa; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00136.html (9,043 bytes)
112. Re: Topband: Strange propagation - antenna suggestions (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:09:36 +0000 (UTC); Dave, I know your dilemma. In addition we are also getting older and most of us likely will have to downsize or relocate. I also like to build and fiddle around with my own station. Operating another; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00225.html (11,478 bytes)
113. Re: Topband: Strange propagation (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:41:40 +0000 (UTC); You could look at this in another way. Wasn't W!BB's location a the Water Tower an early form of RHR, except that he walked to the remote site instead of operating remotely. Does anyone know if Stew; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00367.html (9,593 bytes)
114. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:56:14 +0000 (UTC); Let's all calm down. I believe this latest tirade started with RHR. I may not elect to use it but anyone else is entitled to use the service. We've survived Incentive Licensing, code free licenses, s; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00441.html (9,654 bytes)
115. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:00:04 +0000 (UTC); When someone is doing something wrong we should not "out" or embarrass them. You should try to settle the situation offline without leaving any bad feelings. If you know the offender you should discu; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00496.html (9,804 bytes)
116. Re: Topband: 79th Anniversary of my 1st Ham License (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:47:11 +0000 (UTC); Paul, Congratulations on the milestone. It is good to see you are still active. Your setup makes good use of a small lot and should be an inspiration to others. 73 Mike N2MS -- Original Message -- Fr; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00543.html (10,223 bytes)
117. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:41:12 +0000 (UTC); Andy, It is not clear to me; can a low Power or QRP operator use a remote rx within 100km? Mike N2MS Jorge, this new rule is for SINGLE OPERATOR ASSISTED ONLY. Multi ops, single ops are not allowed t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00682.html (11,377 bytes)
118. Re: Topband: How can I tune an FCP without isolation transformer ??? (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:11:55 +0000 (UTC); Douglas, Have you reviewed K9YC's slides 73 to 79 in this excellent presentation: <http://audiosystemsgroup.com/160MPacificon.pdf> Mike N2MS Correction: I mean i CAN NOT get an isolation transformer.; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00017.html (9,152 bytes)
119. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:15:29 +0000 (UTC); That is the band plan for the US in ITU Region2.. The problem is different ITU regions and countries have different 160 meter assignments. I common worldwide allocation will mitigate lots of these is; /archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00003.html (8,920 bytes)
120. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1): Author: mstangelo@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:02:56 +0000 (UTC); Don, You efforts are appreciated. I can understand the hurdles involved. Mike N2MS Mike - I agree the objective, but the reality is a little harder! The 160 allocations across Europe, for example, va; /archives//html/Topband/2016-03/msg00006.html (11,389 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]