Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160mtr\s+loop\s+for\s+receive\s+only\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160mtr\s+loop\s+for\s+receive\s+only\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160mtr loop for receive only (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:14:41 -0500; Would I be wasting my time on a loop antenna for 160? It just doesn't seem right to be able to get by with so little length of wire. What I mean is there is no surface area involved and I don't see h; /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00109.html (7,579 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160mtr loop for receive only (score: 1): Author: G3SVL <Chris@G3SVL.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:55:59 +0100; Bob, Here's some comments There are folks who rave over them and others who say they add nothing. You won't know until you try it at your QTH. <snip> The signal levels will be way down on a larger an; /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00111.html (8,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]