Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CY9C\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+CY9C\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 19:00:43 -0600; Heard them on and off last night. Lots of QSB. At times they were quite loud. They CQed into many callers at times. I guess they were not hearing well. I never did break through with my bottom l; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00026.html (6,427 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com; Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 17:03:16 +0000; Im mostly a cw op, working 160-6m. Also do some ssb and rtty but not much. Never heard them on 6-10-12m, and waited until the final 3 days to start chasing them, managing to get in their log on 160-8; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00032.html (12,130 bytes)
3. Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Wilson Lamb via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:58:14 -0700; I saw the comment that they were "CQing into callers." This breaks the dam for me. I'm sickened to almost giving up by the deplorable manners shown on the bands these days. Why shouldn't they CQ into; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00033.html (9,002 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 16:25:56 -0700; On 9/6/2024 11:58 AM, Wilson Lamb via Topband wrote: I saw the comment that they were "CQing into callers." This breaks the dam for me. I'm sickened to almost giving up by the deplorable manners show; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00034.html (8,800 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: kolson@rcn.com; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 23:35:57 -0400 (EDT); These days? I am a young spritely kid of 72, but I started DXing about 1970 and the same things were true then as now. To quote David Byrne, "same as it ever was...". I have personally taken the posi; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00035.html (7,932 bytes)
6. Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: "ok1tn " <ok1tn@seznam.cz>; Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:31:29 +0200 (CEST); Hi dxers. I am 78. I have all ctrs cfm. I had a dream to land 300 on 160m. I will not complete the remaining 3 lands. I gave up no more dxcc. Not only the FT8 but also the behavior of some of today's; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00036.html (7,424 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: "Mark, PA5MW via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:20:31 +0200; Hi Slavek, Take a break. I did for some years. It helped. Bad behavior was and will be always here, some decades are worse. At CY9C I decided already early to skip this one. I will work more on lower; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00037.html (9,303 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Hans Hjelmström <sm6cvx@hjelmstrom.se>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:55:42 +0200; Hi Slavek and Mark, Same here .Just lost most of the fun with the new stuff FT 8 and in my opinion,even worse RIB and remote operating like N5J and others. BUT I have changed,and do a few QSO:s month; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00038.html (10,454 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 07:38:09 -0600; Sounds like you were looking for a reason to stop instead of a reason to stay. People have been the same @#$#$holes as they were 50 years ago, they just have more ways to make themselves known. I do; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00039.html (8,936 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: "JC$Jose Carlos$ via Topband" <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 11:45:33 -0400; Hi guys I would like to share my way to see the situation on low bands. Just selecting a target, a goal and or an objective, like number of DXCC entities worked on 160 m as a goal, you will see no jo; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00041.html (8,307 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:30:47 -0400; Mike is correct. Over the past 1/2 century of operating, a lot of it on HF, nothing has really changed. I remember hearing the same thing when SSB showed up to replace AM. And, look at that, the worl; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00042.html (9,220 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: S57AD <mirko.s57ad@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 19:13:27 +0200; Well said, Mike! 73 de S57AD (ham since 1964) V V sob., 7. sep. 2024 ob 18:40 je oseba Michael Walker < va3mw@portcredit.net> napisala: -- Mirko S57AD _________________ Searchable Archives: http://ww; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00043.html (10,104 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 10:58:28 -0700; I view AA7JV's Radio In a Box as the greatest and most innovative engineering achievement in ham radio in my 69 years as a ham. It increases the likelihood of a team getting permission to activate is; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00044.html (11,447 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 14:17:45 -0400; How does this work? IF this is indeed the case, this would be a great solution for multi-op contest stations. Rudy N2WQ Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate auto; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00045.html (8,943 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:56:37 -0500; Hi Slavek, I want to thank you for our many dozens of cw qso's and contest qso's through the past decades. I'm 63 and have been a ham for 51 years and just completed DXCC Honor #1 last year - my "Lif; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00046.html (11,684 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Bill Eisinger <Bill@theeisingers.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 19:06:26 +0000; Sent from my iPhone _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00047.html (8,698 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Bill Eisinger <Bill@theeisingers.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 19:10:11 +0000; I'm going the other way...I'm 71....been licensed for 55 years and have 334 total confirmed but only 12 on 160. I'm doing some antenna renovations and at long last finally going to get a passable ant; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00048.html (8,747 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 12:52:47 -0700; Very careful design of both RX and TX antennas and their matching networks, physical separation of RX and TX antennas, combined with very careful design of very narrow-band pass and reject filters fo; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00049.html (9,782 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 14:30:50 -0600; We ran both phone and CW, both with amps (~1 kw) simultaneously on 160m during the RAC contests. Also did that on all the other bands too. SSB was 1845 and CW was 1825 (we never op on a multiple of a; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00050.html (10,375 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: CY9C (score: 1): Author: "GEORGE WALLNER" <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 16:56:34 -0400; Rudy, Info at https://www.qrz.com/db/C6AGU 73, George Rudy N2WQ Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect. On Sep 7, 2024, at 2:01PM, Jim Brown <jim@audio; /archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00051.html (10,139 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]