Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ EH: 355 ]

Total 355 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] new "thing" (score: 2)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:49:35 -0500
As of today, Friday the 11th it's $23.40 USD with a 1.17 Euros per USD. That's a pretty good contribution. Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2 www
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00364.html (8,876 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] new "thing" (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:39:42 -0500
http://home.tiscali.ch/hb9abx/ant--abx-e.htm Boy, what a hoot that page is. You can get free construction details, but you have to "contribute" 20 Euros (whatever that is). __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00361.html (7,587 bytes)

163. [TowerTalk] new "thing" (score: 2)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:19:18 +0100
Check this out. http://home.tiscali.ch/hb9abx/ant--abx-e.htm I Love the name, capacitive sky radiator. Oh well, it&acute;s a strange world we live in!! 73 Jim SM2EKM _________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00350.html (7,011 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] Crossfield Antenna (score: 2)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:06:11 +0000
Cable radiation, anyone? I've yet to see a review of a CFA/EH that demonstrated the reviewer understood that possibility, took serious precautions against it, and then measured it. Lacking all that,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00328.html (8,452 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] [800 M longwire] Basic question... (score: 2)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:28:18 -0500
Is it "written" someplace that he has to use the entire span for the active antenna??? No, but I have already tried reducing wire length to see if this was a possiblity. A shorter wire results in les
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00494.html (11,445 bytes)

166. [TowerTalk] [800 M longwire] Basic question... (score: 2)
Author: Bgsalesmel@cs.com
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:16:07 EDT
Message: 7 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:54:17 -0500 From: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Size for 800 meter longwire To: towertalk@contesting.com Message-ID: <434E8329.4010704
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00482.html (9,060 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down (score: 2)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:58:03 +0200 (CEST)
Having read Tom's comment about the 2m loop antenna in QST, I went and looked at the article. Back in the 'good ole days' of 2metres, when everything was horizontally polarised AM, and a mobile rig u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00619.html (11,855 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] The Basics (score: 2)
Author: Bob Witte K0NR <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Ward, Thanks for chiming in with the "data comm" metaphor. One thing that I have had to accept in my (too) many years of hanging out in the electronics industry is that people tend to accumulate know
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00592.html (11,524 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS antennas Re: dumbing down (score: 2)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:33:55 +0000
TT: FWIW - Here's a possible source for the eighteen-inch-above-ground NVIS antenna fables: http://www.tactical-link.com/field_deployed_nvis.htm . 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00571.html (10,226 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS antennas Re: dumbing down (score: 2)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:18:14 -0700
Not that THIS author knew what he was talking about.. The original inventor of the 18" idea (which has been around for at least 5-10 years, I think) was the one who decided that it was a "reasonable
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00566.html (11,660 bytes)

171. [TowerTalk] The Basics (score: 2)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 08:43:47 -0700
I have a copy around here somewhere of a letter to the editor in the 1970's from a respected IEEE Fellow complaining that all the basic transconductance technology (vacuum tubes) was being lost in th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00559.html (8,892 bytes)

172. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:32:58 -0400
Then he and his assistants missed a very basic point at the root of what causes radiation. This goes along with my viewpoint. We are losing the basics. If they had a grasp on basics or a good feel f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00554.html (11,122 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down (score: 2)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:00:09 -0400
NVIS means "Not all we hear about anyone want to work DX The letter writer had the NVIS antenna in the correct application. He wanted to use high angle skywave. He just was clueless about groundwave
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00549.html (10,974 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 28, Issue 54 (score: 2)
Author: "Van Fair" <giw@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:09:39 -0400
Leah I need to talk to you before you go any further. Please call me at 972 1060. Thanks Van -- Original Message -- From: <towertalk-request@contesting.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Monda
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00391.html (34,365 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] Real numbers for Rohn BX-64 Re: guying (score: 2)
Author: Steve Maki <steve@oakcom.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:45:24 -0400
Jim, Thanks for going through those calcs, it's much appreciated. Just a couple of questions: Why did you choose 60% guy anchors instead of the commonly recommended 80%? I agree though that 60% is pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00379.html (18,768 bytes)

176. [TowerTalk] Real numbers for Rohn BX-64 Re: guying (score: 2)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:54:59 -0700
OK... some real numbers.. off the Rohn BX data sheets which I found on the web. Whether or not this is a tower anyone would actually use, or contemplate guying is sort of immaterial. It's representat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00375.html (14,844 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] foldover antenna bracket design (score: 2)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:29:12 -0800
There down You Well, it's a heck of a lot easier to climb a ladder propped against the (unextended) tower carrying a few bolts and a wrench than carrying a multiband beam antenna. One might contempla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00634.html (9,148 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] foldover antenna bracket design (score: 2)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:10:04 -0500
Climb a tiltover to latch the beam hinge ... kinda defeats the purpose, eh? ;-) Perhaps an electrically, or mechanically (pull string), powered latch might solve that problem? -- Thanks! & 73, doc k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00633.html (9,248 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] Next step in installing tower: underground power (score: 2)
Author: chris <chris@fite.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:46:33 -0500
John WA2GO wrote: Hi Chris, I am about to embark on the exact same project: put up a new 108' tower about 100' away from power lines, so I am going to bury the power lines. So it's 30 inches, eh? Wha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00291.html (11,221 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated short vertical dipole orquarterwave monopole? (score: 2)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:53:47 -0500
Tom, Are you saying that it is not possible to decouple with a coaxial sleeve such as is commonly used on VHF or UHF collinear antennas ? It was used for many years quite successfully as a quarter wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00030.html (13,135 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu