Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Guy: 918 ] [ Olinger: 862 ]

Total 529 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Antennaware] G5RV vs. 2 element yagi (score: 245)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:53:30 -0400
A Force12 C3SS would outperform the G5RV without the loss of traps. Since 25' is nearly a half-wave on 20m you will be surprised how well a good tribander will do at that height. 73, Guy. I am curren
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00423.html (9,312 bytes)

102. [Towertalk] Box forSPG and Lightning protectors (score: 153)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:51:17 -0400
Part of the confusion here is that a made-to-order commercial radio room is usually going to be a single room inside a shelter, built on a concrete slab, and the problem is protecting everyone's stuf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00714.html (30,053 bytes)

103. [TowerTalk] Angle of maximum wind force on Yagis (score: 146)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:31:04 -0400
For the boom, it would. But for the elements of something like a C31, which flexes a good bit, particularly the 20 meter elements, the computation would be unnecessarily harsh. The figures would come
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00437.html (19,498 bytes)

104. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 146)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:02:08 -0400
You might think a little about it. If it affects one fifteen meter beam in-line, it will affect any because the secondary resonance effect is on the forty meter beam, not the 15 meter beam. Also plea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00472.html (14,608 bytes)

105. Fw: [TowerTalk] Tower sled systems????????????? (score: 146)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 23:36:28 -0500
Not to say that people DON'T build their own, reread my post. I know someone who built an airplane. I also know someone who built several homemade, home-designed towers in excess of 100 feet. They BO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00163.html (14,876 bytes)

106. [TowerTalk] Re: The Ultimate One Tower System (score: 146)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 11:48:34 -0500
If the phase length of the free space horizontal offset (FSHO) is xdeg on 20 then it is 21/14 * xdeg (or 3/2 * xdeg ) on 15, and 28/14 * x (or 2 * xdeg) on 28. If the coax is .66 VF, then the length
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00321.html (12,909 bytes)

107. [TowerTalk] BOUNCE towertalk@contesting.com: Non-member submission from [Dick Flanagan <dflanagan@libelle.com>] (fwd) (score: 146)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 19:33:22 GMT
On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 17:56:37 GMT, k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV) wrote: Got a chance to look at the web page. No fair. His wife is KK7AA.... Guy L. Olinger k2av@qsl.net Apex, NC, USA -- FAQ on WWW:
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00016.html (8,848 bytes)

108. [Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] C-3 & TH7 comparison - a revision] (score: 146)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy L. Olinger)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 21:44:48 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --DA4729C62AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- Guy L. Olinger Apex, NC, USA k2av@qsl.net 'AV since '74, previ
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00951.html (10,243 bytes)

109. [Towertalk] 40M 4 Sq vs. 2 el Yagi at 70 ft (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 16:07:18 -0400
The equivalence is easier to explain with the centers high. But... The ground reflection gain (or lack of it) normally quoted when analyzing this situation is only really in play to the specified db
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00442.html (19,334 bytes)

110. [Towertalk] 160m Inverted L (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:42:00 -0400
Hills, particularly large buildings, sometimes above ground power/telephone/cable distribution (more an issue on 160 than 10, certainly). The closer the building, the smaller it can be and obstruct o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00352.html (8,717 bytes)

111. [Towertalk] Re: Fence update (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:24:58 -0400
The coupling was from the radial field, which ran underneath the metal fence, not from the vertical conductor. The height of the vertical's feedpoint, given buried radials running under the fence, wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00538.html (13,188 bytes)

112. [Towertalk] Coupling phyllistran to ehs (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:18:30 -0400
Although I have seen big grips looped without anything, and no apparent ill effects, on the PLP web page they show a minimum radius they want. Even some thimbles would not do if you take their page s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00773.html (11,934 bytes)

113. [Towertalk] Guy wire resonance. Break it up or use stubs? (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 00:17:18 -0400
Yup, fiberglass if you know to manage the sproing and have some way to deal with the minimum order business. Good stuff. What kind of commercial installations? AM radio stations stay away from dipole
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00372.html (15,946 bytes)

114. [TowerTalk] Tri-bander question (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:49:29 -0400
That's right, in the C3x series the intermix is solved by the closed cell for the driver, and the presence of the 20 reflector is solved by having the 10 ref in front of the 20. In W7WHY's case, thou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00442.html (9,481 bytes)

115. [TowerTalk] Breaking up guy wires for nonresonance (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:33:37 -0400
Ken blends a number of things together in his post. Let's separate them out: Proportions are at issue. Most of the time I have seen a tribander and a two meter 10 element or some such up together, th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00115.html (16,028 bytes)

116. [TowerTalk] Tin roof blues (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:31:10 -0400
RF current causing TVI in tin roofs is particularly possible when the roof is used AS the current sink or is tightly coupled with high current radials immediately above it. The amount of current/volt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00258.html (14,768 bytes)

117. [TowerTalk] Shadowing of small antennas by larger ones? (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:25:56 -0500
Not going in circles for me. Proof? It's not like this is an unvalidated/unmodeled antenna from a fly-by-night company, though we unfortunately do have some manufacturers of that ilk. For general pur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00002.html (10,711 bytes)

118. [TowerTalk] Shadowing of small antennas by larger ones? (score: 138)
Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:23:24 -0500
Read the description carefully. On the C39, the 40 DE is BETWEEN the 15 DE and the 15 reflector, NOT behind the 15 reflector. They HAVE had to deal with removing the 21 mhz resonance from the 40 "N"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00757.html (13,494 bytes)

119. [TowerTalk] Subjective Analysis... was 15 & 40 interaction (score: 138)
Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:19:58 GMT
Heck, no, I'm on your wavelength. Just forgot to acknowledge it. My reply was an augmentation, not a rebuttal. Agree completely, I have my own collection of stories that sound like yours. I asked him
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00327.html (11,030 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 (score: 138)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <k2av.guy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 01:38:36 -0400
Tom, W8JI, put this up in an email, simply reading part 97. Note the term "transmitter power". Power would be measured at the output of the final amplifying stage. A transceiver and an amp would be c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00425.html (15,546 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu