Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Roger: 4336 ]

Total 4336 documents matching your query.

201. [TowerTalk] EIA/TIA-222-E (March 1991) formula (score: 1)
Author: Roger (Roger)
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 09:43:26 -0500
I found it! There really isn't any difference in the formula for wind load for appurtenances (antennas). The main difference is in Table 3, Appurtenance Force Coefficients. For an aspect ratio <= 7,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-05/msg00751.html (7,638 bytes)

202. [TowerTalk] True, True North (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 1998 10:38:49 -0500
Hi Charles and all the TowerTalkians, That's an excellent question. We have evidence of shifts... frozen so to speak, in the rocks. I don't recall how long ago shifts have taken place in the 4.5 bill
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00010.html (9,642 bytes)

203. [TowerTalk] True, True North (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 15:07:28 -0500
one Hi Vic...and all the TowerTalkians..... Thanks for your input. It was most appreciated. Since my beam (a Mosley TA-33) is on a 9-ft peaked roof TOWER on my two story home.... messing around on th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00049.html (10,331 bytes)

204. [TowerTalk] True, True North (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 17:02:52 -0500
SUGGEST YOU WALK AROUND YOU INSTALATION AT NIGHT. FIND THE NORTH STAR AND LINE ONES SELF UP ALIGNING THE NORTH STAR AND THE CENTER OF YOUR TOWER. MARK THAT PLACE WITH SOME SORT OF MARKING. (I USE GRE
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00060.html (13,096 bytes)

205. [TowerTalk] Protective Coatings for Beams (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1998 19:17:38 -0400
Hi Jim, Thanks for all the interesting off-topic info. However I have only two questions... has the aluminum withstood the onslaught of ocean salt without deteriorating substantially.... and was your
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00306.html (9,795 bytes)

206. [TowerTalk] correction (score: 1)
Author: wa9eka@worldnet.att.net (Roger Borowski - K9RB)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 10:14:20 -0400
IIX Equipment Ltd. phone number was listed incorrectly. It is (708) 423-0605 (not 432) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00557.html (6,684 bytes)

207. [TowerTalk] Drooping dipoles (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:57:39 -0400
Joe: There should be an FDA WARNING label on VIAGRA the fast-acting new impodent medication by Pfiser. One needs to swallow it fast...to avoid a stiff neck! Lee Just a note from one visionary to anot
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00842.html (9,822 bytes)

208. [TowerTalk] Dipole Secrets Finally Revealed (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 01:36:08 -0400
Hi gang, We've been following this TowerTalk thread about the low inverted "V" dipoles and it seemed to be an excellent jumping off point for further field research, not unlike the kind we usually co
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00878.html (13,724 bytes)

209. [TowerTalk] TH7DX Gains (score: 1)
Author: Roger (Roger)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 11:50:29 -0500
Steve's recent post which included the gains of the TH7DX made me curious. I found the original project book on the TH7, dated May 21, 1981. My gain measurements on the TH7, dated Sep 4, 1981 show th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00912.html (8,428 bytes)

210. [TowerTalk] TH7DX Gains (score: 1)
Author: Roger (Roger)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 12:45:17 -0500
As time permits, I will post the antenna gain and F/B information that I find onto our web site. 73 Roger WB0DGF Telex Communications, Inc. http://www.hy-gain.com (new) http://ourworld.compuserve.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00920.html (7,348 bytes)

211. [TowerTalk] TH-7 (score: 1)
Author: Roger (Roger)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 16:13:33 -0500
Bob, The average gain of 6.57 dBd comes from the gains assigned by sales in 1981 to each of the three bands: 20m: 5.8 dBd (8.0 dBi), 15m: 6.5 dBd (8.7 dBi) and 10m: 7.4 dBd (9.6 dBi). They chose the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00929.html (7,135 bytes)

212. [TowerTalk] wire-plow for 160 mtr radials? (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 20:16:32 -0400
Hi again Jack, The problem with this great labor saving method is that someday you may wish to aerate or thatch your lawn and then the problems begin snagging you radials... visible or not. The Ditch
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00942.html (12,170 bytes)

213. [TowerTalk] wire-plow for 160 mtr radials? (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 14:17:49 -0400
Chuck: If diggin' a coax trench was anything like you trim those trees of yours, I'd expect a 12-guage, cannon for even a ground torpedo would work!!!!HA You let me down! BOOM! lee -- FAQ on WWW: htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00944.html (9,324 bytes)

214. [TowerTalk] RE: Using the Web....Hint & Kink (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 08:26:03 -0400
YES, IT IS WWW.DOGPILE.COM LEE Just a note from one visionary to another!!:-) ................................................... Lee R. Wical, B.S. in bs; M.S. in more of the same; PhD in common sen
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00996.html (9,631 bytes)

215. [TowerTalk] RE: Using the Web....Hint & Kink (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 07:55:27 -0400
YES, IT IS WWW.DOGPILE.COM LEE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: own
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00997.html (8,707 bytes)

216. [TowerTalk] Nesting of multiband stacked yagis (score: 1)
Author: rrehr@epix.net (Roger Rehr)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 18:50:40 -0500
I am posting this to get considered opinions re: how to position stacked yagis for 144 MHz, 432 MHz, and 1296 MHz, to be used for satellite work (I have become convinced that a high gain linear array
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00056.html (9,257 bytes)

217. [TowerTalk] Adieu to a TowerTalkian (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 21:29:38 -0500
Bye John, Hate to lose you and very sorry to see you go under these circumstances. However, anything this pleasant will not be forgotten and of course we'll all be wishing you'll be back one way or a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00071.html (8,087 bytes)

218. [TowerTalk] TA-33 Parts (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:12:34 -0500
Hi Robert, I can only surmise the reason you're asking for these old parts is because you are under the misimpression that any antenna this old can't possibly be supported by the manufacturer... Mose
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00072.html (9,165 bytes)

219. [TowerTalk] TA-33 Parts (score: 1)
Author: leewical@lava.net (LEE ROGER WICAL)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 19:09:37 -0500
Gang: I believe someone, maybe wa2moe, place Mosley's WEB site with address, phone, FAX and e-mail, if my memory serves me well. And maybe it was all cover in two separate e-mails. Antenna EMS person
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00076.html (10,625 bytes)

220. [TowerTalk] Summary of Nesting of multiband stacked yagis thread (score: 1)
Author: rrehr@epix.net (Roger Rehr)
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 1998 17:22:50 -0500
Thanks to all who responded to the question on "Nesting" of yagis. I got over 20 responses. The gist of things as I interpret the results was nicely summarized by CT1DMK, and his comment makes unders
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-03/msg00125.html (24,882 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu