Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:alex@sandlabs.com: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HDX-555 Stuck (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:21:11 -0500
Which reminds me of an old incident ... A friend of mine asks... I have this problem with my car... it stalls every time I go up hill... Do you know what I have to do? At which he got this replay: Tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00115.html (8,646 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] ++ Fwd: KYTV, Channel 3 - Springfield, MO - Television tower top... (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:16:27 -0500
Given the large investment necessary to bring up these large towers, I all ways wondered why they do not incorporate de-icing facilities into them.!? What is an other $100K when you already spend mil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00139.html (15,753 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Fw: Television Tower Topples Very Heavy Antennas (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 00:16:28 -0500
This is why hams are not allowed to build suspended bridges :):):):) Hope somebody learns from this mishap :( Alex, N2NNU List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Trylon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00153.html (10,096 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Fw: Television Tower Topples Very Heavy Antennas (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 08:05:27 -0500
No need to get defensive Mr. Tower Tech :) It is obvious that the death of the four crew members and the loss of several million dollars caused by the collapse of the tower was due to the phenomenon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00161.html (11,620 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Fw: Television Tower Topples Very Heavy Antennas (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:21:27 -0500
The key word here is "delivered" :) What do the engineers "deliver" ? A piece of paper called a blue print? NO! The engineers have not delivered. They just put a "feasible" dream on paper. The rigger
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00164.html (11,024 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] ++ High SWR and Modern Transceivers (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 23:23:46 -0500
Pete, In general, today's transceivers will reduce the output power function of the detected level of the SWR. Thus, the more SWR you have, the less drive from the transceiver is available. As all ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00248.html (10,989 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] ++ High SWR and Modern Transceivers (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 04:38:12 -0500
Tom. You are promulgating wrong ideas and concepts which will repeated by the neophyte. Please go back to the books and redo your homework about energy conversion/conservation in RF systems. Besides,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00261.html (13,805 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Perpetum Mobile (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:17:11 -0500
OK... here is _minimal_ tech answer... no formulas, no confusion. SWR is a wave. It does really not exist per say. It is just an envelope modulation on the carrier related to group delay, medium velo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00281.html (10,820 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Perpetum Mobile (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:45:55 -0500
This is really the last one :) I am going to give you a simple comparison ... So you will see my point. SWR is for RF what INFLEXION is for voice. Not quite but enough to make the point. Comprende Pa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00286.html (10,657 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Perpetum Mobile (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:02:25 -0500
This reminds me about a discution about hole propagation in semiconductors This chap could not imagine that a "hole" could propagate thru solid mater In principle you are right. And this is the "cons
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00313.html (10,022 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk]++ Trees (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:12:11 -0500
Thanks Blake :) In respect with the nasty neighbor, we are living in NY :) Here everything is possible. Lucky with an understanding judge. I just wonder why my original post did not make it to the li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00353.html (8,555 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] ++ Trees (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 21:32:02 -0500
This message has been censored twice because of what it was considered as unacceptable language. I had to delete the offending sentences. What it comes as a surprise to me is about the exacerbation o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00355.html (10,372 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Brighten up :) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 22:18:58 -0500
Many people have sent me comments about my unusual signature. I collect them and perhaps sometimes I ' ll publish them under the title "Americana" :) Meanwhile I thought to take a break from the dail
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00356.html (8,479 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Brighten up :) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 07:46:40 -0500
EXACTLY my friend. This is the IDEA behind my signature. You will not believe how many comments I got that indicate that the reader is either illiterate or he/she have been brain washed. The low read
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00362.html (8,086 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Brighten up :) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 07:49:54 -0500
EXACTLY my friend. This is the IDEA behind my signature. You will not believe if I told you how many comments I got that indicate that the reader is either illiterate or he/she have been brain washed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00363.html (8,441 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Climbing a tower... NY stile :) (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:20:57 -0500
I got lost yesterday in the hills of Yonkers. At a stop light, I looked at a 300 foot Radio Station tower. Somebody was climbing it. It just appeared to me that he was doing it too fast for a human b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00446.html (8,068 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] My 2c about Relays (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 23:08:45 -0500
When it comes to HAM Amps antenna switching relays, you will be better off in the long run by getting rid of the initial manufacturer components and build the entire switching system your self. I kno
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00485.html (9,023 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] My 2c about Relays (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 01:32:41 -0500
Usually, we do not need QSK. And the sequencing is done by the processor so it comes "free". It is easier to integrate the named relay than a vacuum one. This is not to say we are not using, now and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00488.html (9,006 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Decoding BCD with passive circuit (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 05:40:20 -0500
BCD or Binary Coded Decimal is same as HEX only it rolls over at "9" Thus, you have to decode 9 combinations of 4 bits. Not hard but hardware intensive as diodes take a lot of space. You need pull-up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00491.html (11,105 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Micro Controll (score: 1)
Author: alex@sandlabs.com (alex)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 05:56:05 -0500
If any one needs some Micro Control I will be glad to help. I use for this purpose One Time Programmable (OPT) 8051 which can be an overkill for some applications such as the BCD decoder. If you feel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00492.html (9,336 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu