Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:df3kv@t-online.de: 179 ]

Total 179 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:02:23 +0200
Thats typical guying also for broadcast+military towers in Germany 73 Peter _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00414.html (6,819 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] 80m yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:39:55 +0200
installations. one reason might be that the towers over here are much higher strength and don&acute;t tend to buckle under higher downtension. But thats one reason for being more expensive as well 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00429.html (7,216 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Making a self-supporting tower rotate (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:58:04 +0100
The best approach is to use slewing bearings at the bottom of the tower. This freestanding, 40m high, rotatable tower of a fellow ham with stacked long boom quads works flawless for more the 20 years
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00249.html (9,162 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Monster quad (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:54:23 +0100
Hi Jerry, The big quad weights about 1,5 tons, even there is a special made gin pole at the site to get it up and down, first that gin pole has to be mounted and for that business a smaller gin pole
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00259.html (12,564 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Monster quad (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:56:20 +0100
No, a tiny little beam ;-)) 73 Peter Quad? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00260.html (7,475 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:57:44 +0100
I will certainly avoid srew in anchors in the future. It just happened to me that my tower collapsed after 6 hours of continious heavy rain folled by a storm at 70 miles/hr and a pulled out anchor ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00373.html (13,253 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Screw Anchor Question (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:59:34 +0100
They are about 1,60m long with 20cm blade diameter 73 Peter Of some interest to the list might be the size of your anchors? Jim, W6RMK _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00376.html (10,207 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotator at bottom of tower (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:01:23 +0100
I would not use such a small rotating pipe with an antenna that size, not even with a short mast. With that length I would use at least 4 inch or more. I use a KLM logperiodic with a 36&acute;boom on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00387.html (9,634 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Stripping Gears? (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:59:43 +0100
I learned it twice that worm-gear drive rotators also loose their gears. Two of my Prosistel PST2051 failed with a beam of 0,9m&sup2; at 10m height and only 60km/h wind gusts at that time. The worm a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00004.html (7,854 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Stripping Gears? (score: 1)
Author: "peter.voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:40:48 +0100
The best is to use flanged masts and a double-worm gearbox. I never had any problems with that configuration, even not at 200km/h: http://www.pbase.com/df3kv/image/50045855 http://www.pbase.com/df3kv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00016.html (9,886 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] dirty trix? (score: 1)
Author: "df3kv@t-online.de" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:02:12 +0100
it certainly is , similar happend a few years ago when Optibeams name was taken over by Titanex. alfaspid.com: Administrative Contact: QTH.com Scott Neader (neader@qth.com) seems to be no nice guy...
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00100.html (9,037 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] dirty trix? (score: 1)
Author: "df3kv@t-online.de" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 02:06:40 +0100
I can tell you my experience. I own 4x PST2051, two of them failed mechanically after very short use. One was used to turn a 5-element 20m KLM 12m above ground, the rotator inside the tower with 4m o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00112.html (11,470 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] HDX-555 load question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:17:38 +0200
Hi Hamad, you will most likely not install both beams at one level. When one will be stacked above the other you cannot just add the wind loads. The upper one puts much more bending force on the towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00411.html (8,616 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] HDX-555 load question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:03:15 +0200
Of course it must be guyed at the top and probably above the centre to prevent buckling. I was not talking about guying the bottom section which would be useless. Is there any reason for that particu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00489.html (8,254 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] superflex for rotor loop? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:12:41 +0200
I use standard 1/2" hardline around the rotators for more then 20 years without any problem or cable break. The cables are formed into a one layer spring like that in a mechanical clock. My rotators
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00553.html (9,054 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : Mast for rotator at bottom of tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:52:56 +0200
Jos, I used a brand new GS-065 bearing on top of a small tower to hold the 6m long steel mast and a 5-element 20m yagi at 12m, I used the rotator sitting at the 6m level for rotation only. Weight of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00218.html (9,190 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] FW: Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 02:55:48 +0200
Our regulation EN 361 says if you connect the fall arrest lanyard above and in front of you the front D ring must be used, that certainly applies to tower work. The back D ring must used if the lanya
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00294.html (8,718 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:21:59 +0200
Hi Bill, My dipoles on all three low bands are at 100 feet. The only band where dx is great with the dipole is 40m. On 80m the dipole usually is same strength as the vertical to the US East cost, to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00354.html (10,296 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Fall Arrest Reels - Self Retracting Lifelines (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:28:42 +0200
I would have to pay 3500 US$ here for one to be used with my 150 foot tower 73 Peter, DF3KV We have several different kinds where I work. The big, bad boys have 150' of steel cable and a handle to re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00454.html (8,088 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna; NDBs (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:16:33 +0200
I just recently dismounted and moved a NDB from its old place on the airfield some km out to a new location on a hill. The airfield is a military helicopter base and they just got a new type with a d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00526.html (10,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu