Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hwardsil@centurytel.net: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Gain Is a Function of Boom Length - True and Not True (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:19:29 -0700
It is true that in the absence of other factors, maximum gain is a function of boom length. However, in a multi-band antenna, secondary factors strongly affect how much gain can actually be realized
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00296.html (8,793 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Short Booms (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:11:03 -0700
In terms of raw forward gain, true, but short-boom antennas can be designed to manage the bedeviling secondary factors in ways that make them better antennas than poorly implemented long-boom antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00304.html (8,024 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] C31-XR versus KT36XA (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:49:48 -0700
A slight clarification on the exact problem with the KT34XA... When we started presenting data, as Steve said, several other XA owners came up and said, "Mine acts JUST LIKE THAT and nobody has ever
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00438.html (11,172 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Re: Topband: Using 1/2" PVC Conduit Vs. the (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:08:36 -0800
less I just got out and whomp 'em to death with a plastic owl. You might also consult Hunter Thompson's essays for a number of innovative, yet amusing, solutions. 73, Ward N0AX _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00334.html (7,826 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Re: Nonconductive Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:50:32 -0800
feet of antenna with ice and 110 mph wind...you can put 500 pounds at the top... It will do all of that. Just not at the same time. 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ See:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00499.html (7,037 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Re: Horizontal + Vertical Polarization Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:17:28 -0800
This was extensively investigated in the 1930's through the 1950's. I believe the BBC and British Defense engineering staffs did a lot of the work since they of farflung empire "over which the F-lay
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00522.html (8,636 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Re: Building a Gamma Match (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:01:20 -0800
For a look at a simple gamma match technique - find a copy of A. Alvareztorres, AA1DO, "Two On Ten," QST, April 1999, pp. 67-69. Al (now an SK) uses a tubular matching capacitor that is much easier t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00283.html (7,598 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Re: BPL: Presidential Backing (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:38:51 -0700
Marlon, The number one reason that the amateur service exists is stated in the FCC's Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio Service, rule 97.1(a) - "Recognition of amateur radio's exceptional capabil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00602.html (8,442 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Sorry... (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:05:59 -0700
I replied to an earlier message in one of many Towertalk digests I was slogging through after being gone for a few days. I suppose I should go through these things backwards. Sorry for the redundedun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00605.html (7,526 bytes)

30. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Redux (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 16:46:21 -0700
use, they collapse down to 3 feet (each side) or whatever. This would reduce the 2 be a big advantage for restricted QTH's. Here's an even better idea for a low-profile antenna. Figure out how to dr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00123.html (8,362 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 17, Issue 64 (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 20:16:02 -0700
The antenna has achieved a mechanical soundness rating of 1.0 on the Leeson Scale - that's equivalent to the number of winters the antenna has survived the W6NL mountaintop and come out intact. That
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00479.html (9,138 bytes)

32. RE: [TowerTalk] Archeological find in my Anchor hole (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:49:33 -0700
Tradition has it that you put in one card from each of the continents (don't forget Antartica!) and it has to be a real card, not a made up one. It helps if you arrange them in the appropriate direc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00138.html (9,368 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Figuring Out Prop Pitch Wiring (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:36:40 -0700
Hi all, As you may have heard, John N7TT is the proud new owner of the W7RM QTH in southwestern WA. John has a bit of a project on his hands, to say the least, as he restores the "infrastructure". In
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00394.html (7,857 bytes)

34. RE: [TowerTalk] Hole Digging Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:56:04 -0700
give the dirt away. Spoken like a True Ham! :-) 73, Ward N0AX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00642.html (8,335 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] R-7000 Matching Network Schematic (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:56:00 -0700
Anybody have a schematic for the R-7000 Matching Network? (aka - MN7000) I'm re-creating an R-7000 that is missing the matchbox. Already tried the usual Googling, but there are no links to active Web
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00712.html (7,031 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] MN7000 Schematic (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 10:03:05 -0700
Thanks for all the quick responses to my request for help. By far the most useful reference I received was... http://www.iol.ie/~bravo/r7_vertical.htm EI7BA's page was very helpful and had info on th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00725.html (6,988 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Funniest thing I've seen in weeks (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:10:12 -0000
Another good example is the small receiving loops with a sharp null broadside to the plane of the loop. As far as gain goes, they are pitiful - at least 20 dB below even a mediocre vertical. But ste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00967.html (9,316 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum tube 100 years old today (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:58:52 -0800
I'll bet it only had one nut in the shell... Hmmm...would that make it "a salt weapon?" 73, Ward N0AX circuitry. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00525.html (9,279 bytes)

39. RE: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:19:09 -0800
One thing has been overlooked in the discussion of grounding with respect to lightning and ac safety. I don't disagree with anything W3LPL had to say, but I would like to point out that it is importa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00543.html (8,820 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] substandard aluminum (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:08:39 -0800
The old-fashioned way was to use rules of thumb and excessive safety margins because the mechanics of the material were not sufficiently well understood to support less rigid designs. It's the same
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00021.html (8,203 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu