Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Short Booms

To: "Towertalk Reflector" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Short Booms
From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Ward Silver <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:11:03 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> No amount of clever engineering in areas of element interaction, feed
> efficiency, tuning networks (i.e. - traps), impedance matching gadgetry,
> etc. can make up for a short boom.
>
> True?
>
> 73 - Bryan W4WMT

In terms of raw forward gain, true, but short-boom antennas can be designed
to manage the bedeviling secondary factors in ways that make them better
antennas than poorly implemented long-boom antennas.  Antennas are complex
critters with a lot of parameters to consider - bandwidth, front-to-back,
SWR, feedpoint impedance, and mechanical robustness - that require
compromises in gain.  In determining bang for the buck, one has to define
"bang" pretty carefully.

73, Ward N0AX


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>