Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:infomet@embarqmail.com: 341 ]

Total 341 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Selsyns (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:22:46 -0500
Could it be that the M stands for motor and the G for generator?? Wilson W4BOH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00017.html (6,519 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Tower Question (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:43:35 -0500
Your answer seems to be talking about a tiltup, not a crankup?? Wilson W4BOH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00028.html (6,589 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Tower Design (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:31:25 -0500
I've seen mention of design spreadsheets. Can someone point me to them? Most of the tower bases I see, especially in the case of guyed towers, seem way oversize and I'd like to work through a few des
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00120.html (8,095 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:34:57 -0500
I'd appreciate hearing of experience with LP beams, especially performance vs number of elements. The little T6 spec's are remarkably similar to the T10, but some experienced people are pretty adaman
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00121.html (7,030 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Beam Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:50:21 -0500
Dino, that's a great bunch of links. I'll get on 'em as xmas duties allow. Reason for log is simple. I want to try WARC and with LP I get that AND the old bands AND no traps. I'm 68 and hope to only
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00124.html (11,995 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23 (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:56:52 -0500
You are self supporting 36' of tower. Rohn will tell you straight out that 25G is not self supporting to any height. Your bracket must be a pretty stout one, on a good wall! Wilson W4BOH -- Original
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00149.html (17,768 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 84, Issue 23 (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:59:10 -0500
Re TH-7 Traps R traps. Don't want 'em. No doubt it works as you say, but I'm 68 and this thing is planned to not be worked again by me. Wilson W4BOH -- Original Message -- From: <towertalk-request@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00150.html (17,801 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Ladder Line Splice (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:50:08 -0500
The home stores sell little kits for splicing well pump wire. They have good heat shrink with goo inside. When the tubing shrinks, the glue is squeezed into the joint and out the ends of the tube. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00278.html (7,976 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:57:40 -0500
Assembly question: Does everyone work above the guywires to stack higher sections? Rohn says point blank that 25 is not self supporting "at any height" and that temporary guys should be attached as o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00103.html (7,420 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:43:42 -0500
Trying again on this post... Well, I have enjoyed studying all the thoughtful replies to my questions about 25G and its installation. Thanks. Funny thing, though. I don't KNOW any more than before. S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00277.html (9,768 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Guywires (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 13:42:20 -0500
Well, we have certainly beaten this horse, although I doubt if we have cleared anything up! I want to make a couple of points. I think the long guy, more horizontal, more catenary, WILL have a lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00324.html (8,678 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Kurt's Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:05:45 -0500
WOW, kurt should get e big prize and cheers from all of us! This reminds me of the stuff I used to see when I worked next to a group of first class FEA people analyzing far more complicated structure
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00349.html (7,791 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Coax Entry (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:05:28 -0500
If you want to stay underground, look for someone who bores concrete. Usually it's a small operator and when I did it the minimum charge was about $175, which might actually pay for two holes. He cam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00425.html (9,108 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: LP v SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:05:22 -0500
OK, I'll say it. It's no fun for me to put that much "stuff" and money (StepIR) up in the air. Yes, I could "afford" one, but my ham fun leans much more to getting good results from less than stellar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00511.html (9,935 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Roll Your Own Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:10:38 -0500
It's never good to impugn another culture, but John's message pushes one of my very hot buttons. With people becoming more and more helpless and government taking over more and more things we should
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00675.html (12,557 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Delta Loop Feed (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:32:51 -0500
I have no good experience and haven't modeled, BUT we did put up a 40m delta at FD one yr. It was an interesting exercise. We left the wire free to run at the corners, connected an analyzer, and slid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00063.html (7,266 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Coax Loss (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:06:59 -0500
This might be a little easier if we remember that the dB expression refers to a multiplication. 10 dB loss means you multiply by 0.1. Thinking of it this way, and remembering that multiplication is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00120.html (8,544 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] tower installation HG52SS (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:25:21 -0500
If you really have rock, why are you digging? The big concrete bases above ground are impressive, but if not securely attached to rock, they will easily turn over! There's no need for all that rebar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00329.html (11,131 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 86, Issue 53 (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:44:33 -0500
In answer to Kipton, below. The slug of concrete sitting in the rock bowl can't be expected to hold anything, unless the sides of the hole are near vertical. The point of the rods drilled into the ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00348.html (9,350 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 86, Issue 53 (score: 1)
Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:09:58 -0500
Well, I Googled it, finally. Did you realize it's rated for 50 mi/hr, with max load, 9.5 SF? I'm betting a big triband quad will get close to that, as will a large triband beam. The T-11 LP is 11.5,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00353.html (16,759 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu