Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@luxfamily.com: 315 ]

Total 315 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] Joining two perpendicular wires (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:45:12 -0700
On 7/13/21 4:52 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote: Like many posts, this went off on a tangent. If it was for connecting two parallel wires, I would have suggested the western-union splice. I use this splice a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-07/msg00055.html (10,943 bytes)

82. Re: [TowerTalk] Phillystran Tension Gage (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:10:34 -0700
Be aware that the Kevlar fibers of Phillystran behave very differently than steel wire.  The Kevlar fiber is very strong axially with about 60% the modulus of steel.  The fiber also has very complex
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-07/msg00073.html (10,913 bytes)

83. Re: [TowerTalk] remote reading multimeter (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:25:24 -0700
A multimeter with a couple hundred feet remote readout.  Best if the readout was on my android phone, but a pc would be acceptable.  The need is troubleshooting stuff happening at the tower/up the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-07/msg00131.html (9,298 bytes)

84. Re: [TowerTalk] Dummy Load (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:01:19 -0700
On 7/27/21 1:56 PM, JOHN OWENS wrote: It is pretty clear that my Heathkit Dummy load is Dead. I need to measure my FTDX-101MP output on 6M (<200w) just to verify it is working as it should, before I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-07/msg00154.html (7,939 bytes)

85. Re: [TowerTalk] New dummy load question (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:15:25 -0700
I have a multi-KW forced air-cooled dummy load. It came from the Boeing plant in Wichita KS. The official designation is "Dummy Load Modulator". Dummy load I understand, but WHAT is the "modulator" p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-07/msg00158.html (7,171 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] Experience with Sacrificial Zinc? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:12:07 -0700
Brite-Zinc seems to me like an anti-rust paint, for protection. Usually on steel. Urethane aliphatic enamel is a synthetic cover to give an extra protection layer on the top of the zinc. Professional
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-08/msg00045.html (9,475 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] Terminate unused ports on remote antenna switch? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:19:21 -0700
On the RCS-8V, that's an optional jumper - the instructions tell you where to bridge with solder. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-08/msg00062.html (9,010 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] Terminate unused ports on remote antenna switch? (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:26:19 -0700
On 8/10/21 4:40 PM, KD7JYK DM09 wrote: For my situation, I am planning to install 1 kw dummy loads to the unused ports and see what happens. I was hoping that someone would provide some realistic inp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-08/msg00064.html (10,924 bytes)

89. [TowerTalk] Overvoltage and transient protection (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:28:46 -0700
I'll make a pitch here for a useful book by Ronald Standler "Protection of Electronic Circuits from Overvoltages" Rather than blindly copy another design (which may have had other design constraints,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00010.html (7,120 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] TH-7 (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:48:29 -0700
<There was an op in Texas who mounted 4 of these on a rotating tower. There <was an article in one of the ham magazines some years ago about it. But it <was impressive. The TH7 has 5 elements on 10mt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00024.html (8,579 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] TH-7 (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 11:50:05 -0700
I'd be surprised by more than 3 dB I'd want to see a comparison with the same transmitter and feed lines, and just turn the other 3 antennas off. After all, if he had 100W feeding each antenna, rathe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00025.html (8,663 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] TH-7 (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:17:48 -0700
At theoretical best, 6dB, unless there is significant mutual coupling, and even then... Power going to antennas divides by 4, -6dB to each antenna. Electric fields from each antenna sum coherently, s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00029.html (9,157 bytes)

93. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:58:23 -0700
Thanks Stan, K5GO The traditional guide line for antenna ranges is 2 D^2/lambda, where D is the diameter of the antenna.  That has to do with the phase difference from a plane wave being small enough
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00042.html (7,507 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:28:47 -0700
I have absolutely no hard engineering facts for you, other than to say that when I installed my 4-squares a few years ago, I located a small signal source about 200' away from all the arrays and made
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00045.html (9,054 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:32:09 -0700
Thanks, Jim. Stan Sent from my iPhone You're right.. brain freeze. But 22.5 meters seems awfully close.   2 D^2/lambda is the equation - 2 * 30*30/80 = 1800/80 = 22.5 meters Granted that's for "direc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00046.html (10,316 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:19:01 -0700
and look at the figure on  page 4.  This shows the usual antenna range situation where the test antenna is receiving a signal from a point, or small aperture source.  This is how I would run this com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00052.html (9,615 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 08:31:50 -0700
On 9/5/21 6:31 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: On 2021-09-04 11:19 PM, Lux, Jim wrote: D =30m (across the 4 square diagonally) is almost certainly bigger than the height of the 80m elements (20m?) Even t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00057.html (14,646 bytes)

98. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:11:54 -0700
On 9/5/21 12:36 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: Instead of using rules of thumb from ancient history, you can get a far more precise answer by simply modeling the antennas under test and the test
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00060.html (10,434 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] Field Strength comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:49:12 -0700
This was for a 4 square transmitting array and a movable receiving vertical. 73 Rick N6RK So you set up a "test receiver" vertical, and looked at the current in the vertical (or in a load resistor)?
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00068.html (9,695 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] Nut & Bolt Sealant (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 19:01:12 -0700
I assumed Locktite Blue or Red would do that for me but I have since learned there are dozens & dozens versions. I clearly picked the wrong products as they never "dried" or hardened. I have 263 Red
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-09/msg00074.html (11,677 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu