Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 412 ]

Total 412 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical or Tower (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:24:14 -0400
You are only 1 hour away from me. When do we start? == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00480.html (7,318 bytes)

162. Re: [TowerTalk] My Digging "the Hole" story (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:36:19 -0400
Yes -- they are good people, but they have no clue about the value of ham radio, and are not good prospects for radio enthusiasts. You should see what THEY picked for hubbies! They are no good for ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00499.html (9,392 bytes)

163. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical AntennaInstead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:48:27 -0400
Interesting answers, and intriguing discussion about folded unipole designs... but not entirely helpful to me, as the City only allows 55 foot tall antennas/towers, and I cannot get one up this Fall,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00510.html (9,861 bytes)

164. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical AntennaInstead ofTower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:09:07 -0400
Amen, Bruddah. The good news is that I am having a good time playing ham radio operator. The bad news is the fact there are so many options, ideas, and all, that it is hard to pick one or two and thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00521.html (9,847 bytes)

165. Re: [TowerTalk] coax stripper (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:24:23 -0400
They sell both the stripper and the handy holder for installing the plug. I think the post had both items URLs == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00525.html (7,058 bytes)

166. Re: [TowerTalk] coax stripper (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:23:17 -0400
okay -- that makes sense. I didn't realize it said it that way. Happy trails and 73. -- Richards - K8JHR -- == -- _______________________________________________ _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00548.html (8,000 bytes)

167. Re: [TowerTalk] Spark Gap on an insulated tower (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:52:08 -0400
Why not check out I.C.E and DX-Engineering and the like, and see what they make for this purpose. Much better than trying to re-invent the wheel yourself, I think. http://www.iceradioproducts.com/ ht
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00101.html (7,834 bytes)

168. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:21:30 -0400
Geeze, Gary, I toured your photos of mountain top QRP trips. Wow. == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00114.html (8,899 bytes)

169. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding with Polyphaser lightning arrestors (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:10:34 -0400
What does Polyphaser company say to do? Why not use in-line line isolation chokes/baluns, like the ones from Unadilla (W2DU INLINE-HF) you see here? http://www.unadilla.com/w2dinline.htm http://www.r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00120.html (8,745 bytes)

170. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding with Polyphaser lightning arrestors (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:51:06 -0400
I did not pay attention to the fact you are suggesting the use of the choke/ISOLATION baluns as LIGHTENING PROTECTION -- and, I was thinking you were just going to use them to minimize or eliminate c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00123.html (8,270 bytes)

171. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower damaged by Hurricane Ike - where can I get help? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:23:06 -0400
I agree with Steve... you MIGHT have coverage. Did your official claims adjuster make an official reading of the policy.....? If not, I say you file an official, complete, WRITTEN CLAIM FORM and dema
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00132.html (8,755 bytes)

172. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials Layed On/Under Uneven Grade (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:22:08 -0400
Butternut, Moseley, Hy-Gain and other mfrs have all told me that would not cause any problems at my QTH == K8JHR == whether this will be all that detrimental to the antenna's efficiency, angle of rad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00169.html (7,170 bytes)

173. Re: [TowerTalk] Chushcraft striks again #$%^@^%^ (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:16:27 -0400
I disagree -- His MONEY WAS GOOD... the service quality was NOT. Gee, sorry to hear about your loss. One DOES expect to get what he paid for - from any vendor or mfr, and it really sucks when it come
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00203.html (7,502 bytes)

174. Re: [TowerTalk] Shipping (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:38:18 -0400
Ouch -- kinda makes me re-think this whole tower thing... ;-) Maybe that dipole is working OK after all.... I mean all that foreign DX is over rated anyway... right...? ;-) == K8JHR == The quote for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00234.html (7,285 bytes)

175. Re: [TowerTalk] ROHN 25G (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:21:53 -0400
FB Station. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00298.html (7,545 bytes)

176. Re: [TowerTalk] "Sluggo" Ground Rod driver (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:49:09 -0400
Did he use it to POUND the rod into the ground or did it SCREW or TWIST it into the ground? I have used a post pile driver with two handles and you pound down with it. == K8JHR == welded a piece on t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00305.html (7,791 bytes)

177. Re: [TowerTalk] "Sluggo" Ground Rod driver (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:55:44 -0400
I am happy for it because I will be doing this several times in the coming weeks. Besides it is really on topic. Towers need ground rods... which need to be pounded in the ground. As topical as discu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00321.html (9,339 bytes)

178. Re: [TowerTalk] "Sluggo" Ground Rod driver (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:59:29 -0400
Amen, Bruddah! That is what I have used... you can get a light weight one at Lowes Home Depot Shack or the like foir about $15, but I rented a really heavy one for an hour once to pound in five rods
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00322.html (9,446 bytes)

179. Re: [TowerTalk] "Sluggo" Ground Rod driver (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:13:53 -0400
Thank you. == Richards == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00325.html (9,500 bytes)

180. Re: [TowerTalk] The Future of Towers & Antennas? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:24:08 -0400
Well, Shoot, Don... you never heard of "anti-matter" ...? ;-) == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00371.html (7,785 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu