- 41. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Work (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:39:42 -0500
- Try Don, K4ZA who wrote the tower work book for the ARRL. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-01/msg00099.html (8,607 bytes)
- 42. [TowerTalk] Slightly OT - antenna damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:41:50 -0400
- While I was in Asia a tornado came through the yard and damaged three antennas - two of the three antennas on the tower and one ground mounted. My insurance company isn't exactly sure how to figure t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00050.html (7,698 bytes)
- 43. Re: [TowerTalk] Slightly OT - antenna damage (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:22:35 -0400
- Thanks for all replies - private and on the forum. The real thrust of my query was who did people use to assess the damage to satisfy the insurance company. Most adjusters will not have a clue. A loc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-06/msg00054.html (10,571 bytes)
- 44. [TowerTalk] Tower spacing (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:35:08 -0400
- I have 100ft (30m) tower that will have a 3 el 40M yagi and 80M rotatable dipole on it. I am going to put up another tower (probably 70 feet, maybe 80 feet) for a log periodic array for 30-10M and pr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00192.html (7,707 bytes)
- 45. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower spacing (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 06:24:57 -0400
- I hadn't really thought about elevated radials. I currently have 32 128(+/-) foot radials under the 100 foot tower although some radials have bends in them (the tower is 70 feet from the house and ab
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00202.html (10,605 bytes)
- 46. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower spacing (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:32:41 -0400
- Spacing at the moment is likely to be around 80-100 feet. It could be more if need be by moving it off the N-S line although selling it to the "architectural consulting committee - the XYL" would be
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00208.html (10,191 bytes)
- 47. Re: [TowerTalk] 8-pin auto cables for rotor disconnects (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:30:15 -0400
- The Wireman (www.thewireman.com) in SC sells that kind of thing. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@conte
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00094.html (8,787 bytes)
- 48. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:10:20 -0400
- Go to http://rohnnet.com/rohn-45g-tower and download or view the 45G Brochure which shows various configurations and recommended bases/guy anchors. _______________________________________________ ___
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00156.html (8,246 bytes)
- 49. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:47:28 -0400
- The Rohn 45G brochure shows a round base 2'6" in diameter, 4 feet in the ground, with 6" above ground, with pier pin for towers up to 150' at 110mph wind. Same base is OK for up to 200' at lower wind
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00172.html (11,674 bytes)
- 50. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:19:22 -0400
- I agree. I have rebar in my base. The 45GSR (?, solid side rails) has a base with a short base in it and it has but no vertical rebar. Its base is bigger (4'6" square and 4 foot depth, 3 cu yd of con
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00177.html (15,254 bytes)
- 51. Re: [TowerTalk] 45g Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:45:13 -0400
- What we need is a "Steppir" tower. In the 1980's I operated at a station with stacked yagis. We could often open 20M early with all three yagis connected. But as time went on the propagation would ch
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00178.html (12,398 bytes)
- 52. Re: [TowerTalk] low band antenna without good ground (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:24:08 -0400
- The small square image on the web site you pointed to looks like a split ground wire bolt. I have not seen them as galvanized before but they are readily available in several sizes in brass in the el
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00289.html (12,382 bytes)
- 53. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Base Round or Square? (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:27:56 -0400
- The current Rohn 25G/45G brochures actually show round bases but the notes allow for a square base. The GSR (solid rod rails) brochure shows a square base with a tower piece embedded in the concrete
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00411.html (9,689 bytes)
- 54. Re: [TowerTalk] pipe anchors (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 18:36:15 -0400
- I use steel I beams in concrete for my 100 foot 45G. It has been up more than 10 years. It has a KT36XA, F12 80M rotatable dipole and 2 el 40M yagi about 17 feet above the top of the tower (total of
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00473.html (14,409 bytes)
- 55. [TowerTalk] Dropping guys (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:50:08 -0500
- I was looking for a detailed description of dropping guys on a guyed tower to raise an antenna but didn't see anything in my searches that looked like such a description. I think I know how it is don
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00193.html (6,765 bytes)
- 56. Re: [TowerTalk] Dropping guys (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:20:01 -0500
- I usually use a tram line for putting up the antennas but I have a bigger antenna (4el 40M) that will be awkward at best with a tram line to put up this time. I may still have to do the install with
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00197.html (9,236 bytes)
- 57. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pull Rope (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:09:28 -0500
- All of the Rohn drawings for shorter 25G towers recommend 3/16 EHS guys which has a tensile strength around 4000 lbs. The rope probably has considerably more stretch than EHS which could be troubleso
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00206.html (9,455 bytes)
- 58. Re: [TowerTalk] Dropping guys (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:29:55 -0500
- The tower (100 feet) had a 2 el 40M, 80M rotatable dipole, and KT36XA (top to bottom) on it. All were pulled up a tram line one at a time. The KT36XA and 40M were damaged by a tornado this past sprin
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00209.html (10,909 bytes)
- 59. Re: [TowerTalk] Dropping guys (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:38:39 -0500
- I have heard of a couple of people assemble antennas on the tower over the years. I would have think about that some because it seems like that could be very awkward to build it on the tower. The ant
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00210.html (10,659 bytes)
- 60. Re: [TowerTalk] Dropping guys (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:27:35 -0500
- I want to thank all of you who took time to explain and/or comment. The general scheme of dropping guys was just as I thought it was but it is helpful to have input from those who have done it to be
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-11/msg00256.html (13,474 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu