Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4kg@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4kg@juno.com: 1306 ]

Total 1306 documents matching your query.

281. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:33:25 -0600; Jim, and closed' the band compared with your friend using the HyGain 5L Monobanders, suggesting you had more signal at the LOWER angles while his signal peaked during the middle of the opening and wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00065.html (13,698 bytes)
282. [Towertalk] Log Periodics vs Stacked Monobanders (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:46:04 -0600; Good Point ! W6NL (ex W6QHS) noted considerable interaction when all 3 HyGain 5L Monobanders were stacked on the same mast. I expect it would be better to move the 5L10 and 5L15 to a separate 50 or 6; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00075.html (7,538 bytes)
283. [Towertalk] Log Periodics vs. Monobanders (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 22:20:11 -0600; Thanks for clarifying K7UP's arrangement Jim. With his 5L10 at 98 ft, assuming FLAT terrain, there are two main lobes supported by the ionosphere, namely from 3 to 8 degrees and from 13 to 18 degrees; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00079.html (10,294 bytes)
284. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 01:20:34 -0600; A *simple* solution to the 100 ft space limited antenna problem is to just install a 100 ft center fed dipole using Ladder Line feeders and an Antenna Tuner such as a Johnson Matchbox. I have 4 Ladde; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00117.html (9,600 bytes)
285. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:08:24 -0600; I use the 450 ohm window ladderline mostly. Incidently, a COAX fed 80M dipole will also work well on the WARC bands since the center is a current maximum, or nearly so, on 30, 17, and 12M where a dip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00128.html (11,890 bytes)
286. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:08:24 -0600; I use the 450 ohm window ladderline mostly. Incidently, a COAX fed 80M dipole will also work well on the WARC bands since the center is a current maximum, or nearly so, on 30, 17, and 12M where a dip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00129.html (11,785 bytes)
287. [Towertalk] double bazooka (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:08:24 -0600; I use the 450 ohm window ladderline mostly. Incidently, a COAX fed 80M dipole will also work well on the WARC bands since the center is a current maximum, or nearly so, on 30, 17, and 12M where a dip; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00130.html (11,681 bytes)
288. [Towertalk] HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 12:33:34 -0600; In a word, it SUCKS on 80M. OK on 40M. Tom N4KG Dual Band Verticals for 80 and 40 meters - de N4KG The HF-2V is full size (or nearly so) on 40M but base loaded on 80M. Base loading is the LEAST effic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00138.html (10,193 bytes)
289. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:39:18 -0600; Interesting results. NN6K 80M DXCC = 80 countries with HF2V KZ4V 80M DXCC = 280 countries with inverted vee at 90 ft (NE/SW) and vertically polarized Delta Loop at 90 ft (NW / SE) N4KG 80M DXCC = 322; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00143.html (9,731 bytes)
290. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:39:18 -0600; Interesting results. NN6K 80M DXCC = 80 countries with HF2V KZ4V 80M DXCC = 280 countries with inverted vee at 90 ft (NE/SW) and vertically polarized Delta Loop at 90 ft (NW / SE) N4KG 80M DXCC = 322; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00144.html (9,875 bytes)
291. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 22:14:22 -0600; N4KG comments inserted below. On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 21:40:32 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: For the most part, this is true, until you reach 250-280 and have to work over the pole; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00151.html (11,402 bytes)
292. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:53:53 -0600; On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:24:37 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: I meant countries *located* over the pole. I recognize that the signals actually diverge around the poles or come LP.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00162.html (16,936 bytes)
293. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:52:10 -0600; On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:13:30 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: EVERYTHING seems to work better to Europe from GA than from ALA :-( My HIGH Dipoles seem to play better to Central EU; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00176.html (12,492 bytes)
294. [Towertalk] mast (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 06:22:56 -0600; The SCARIEST thing I have ever done on a tower was to install a 20+ ft 100 lb. mast in my 130 ft tower. If your tower is NOT already in place, it is MUCH better to place the mast inside the bottom 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00184.html (10,110 bytes)
295. [Towertalk] 2 ele 40 Meter Mosley, Manual? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:31:24 -0600; I hate to say this again, but did you contact MOSLEY? The single most likely source for manuals is the MANUFACTURER. Mosley will send FREE manuals just for the asking. Tom N4KG ______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00203.html (8,216 bytes)
296. [Towertalk] F12 C4S (and 40M Dipoles) (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:10:30 -0600; I give a STRONG second to K2AV's endorsement of rotary dipoles (for ANY band). There's a lot to be said for having a Horizontal Antenna (4 to 6 dB ground reflection gain), up high, in the clear, and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00204.html (14,606 bytes)
297. [Towertalk] 4-square vs 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:26:22 -0600; Hello Dick, I'm not surprised, although the 6 dB per S unit estimate may be 'optimistic'. MOST receivers I've measured are 'generous' below S9, sometimes being only 1 to 3 dB per S unit. This can be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00206.html (14,695 bytes)
298. [Towertalk] 40M Dipoles (Was: Need EZNEC model 402CD..) (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:08:55 -0600; Note that Bill's model shows a simple (full size) 40M Dipole at 1/2 WL (70 ft high) is 2.3 dB stronger than a 4 Square, providing further support to the notion that a 40M rotary dipole is a good, sim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00233.html (11,001 bytes)
299. [Towertalk] 40M Dipoles (Was: Need EZNEC model 402CD..) (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:08:55 -0600; Note that Bill's model shows a simple (full size) 40M Dipole at 1/2 WL (70 ft high) is 2.3 dB stronger than a 4 Square, providing further support to the notion that a 40M rotary dipole is a good, sim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00234.html (11,015 bytes)
300. [Towertalk] Inverted "L" on 40/80? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:28:02 -0600; 80? The main problem on 160M is the size of a 1/4 WL vertical (130 ft). The inverted L is a useful alternative that allows shorter supports to be used for that band. One down side to the inverted L i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00235.html (8,166 bytes)

Current List: 281 - 300
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]