Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:no9e@arrl.net: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Can 1/4" or 3/8" Andrew SUPERFLEX be used for a Rotor loop? (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:31:50 -0400
M&P connectors seem big and they twist. I bought a few of their cables and they seem to have the loss as advertised. But one of their 7mm cables developed an intermittent that took a long time to fin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-07/msg00191.html (12,431 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Limits of swinging gate (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:38:35 -0400
I would like to phase my current JK Mid Tri 40 on 100' of 45G with JK Mid Tri at 65-70'. Two options are fixed mount to EU or swinging gate like below: http://www.idctechnology.net/sw/sw.html one is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-08/msg00234.html (7,052 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter Yagis (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:57:15 -0400
I have JK Mid Tri 40 at 100'. I adjusted it at the 5 ft level for resonance as in the manual (200 KHz down), and the resonance turned too low at 7.020. SWR is about 2:1 at 7.1 and 3:1 on 7.2. But I a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00213.html (9,333 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical dipole other choices? (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:26:48 -0400
Interesting discussion, with many points coming from simulation. I am just wondering how good the simulation is for vertical antennas since it seems to depend on zillions of factors. Much more than f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-10/msg00277.html (10,219 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Coax measurements for stacking with VNA via TDR (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:32:05 -0500
I am adding a tribander for stacking and need to have the same length of coax as the first antenna. Are TDR measurements good enough? TDR measurements via RigExpert seem to be +-1 ft accurate. Ignacy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00133.html (7,371 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Isolating adjacent 4-Squares (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:09:45 -0500
Actually, Charlie's problem is an exciting one to look at and experiment. Not sure what he means that the array is not working. I suspect poor F/B or high SWR. Many ways to troubleshoot when the weat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2020-12/msg00081.html (11,360 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Weird RFI at remote location (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 20:53:33 -0500
Happy New Year! I bought 26 ac of land with an old house for a remote station. The power company buried the last 300 ft of power line. Now, the location has 100ft tower with 40-10 beam, 4 sq on 80, w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-01/msg00037.html (8,237 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Weird RFI at remote location (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 21:32:30 -0500
Thank you for many useful directions. As my noise is usually cancelled completely by a noise blanker, this suggests a powerline noise. The noise persists with the local power off so it is not generat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-01/msg00048.html (8,498 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Weird RFI at remote location - Solved (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 20:03:12 -0500
A few weeks ago I asked for help with RFI on my "dream" rural ham-radio property. A powerline-type noise was present 24h/day and was strongest on 15m peaking S5. Readings from beverages and 4 sq were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-01/msg00106.html (9,584 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Weird RFI at remote location (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:45:55 -0500
A manager said they disconnected the transformer. That pole was old and not used in years so there was no reason to keep it on. Ignacy NO9E _______________________________________________ ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-01/msg00116.html (8,951 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] 4-squares on the wrong band (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 21:30:50 -0500
Perhaps not too much magic. 40m vertical on 20m would act as half wave, with a low radiation angle. 80m vertical on 20m would act as full wave, with a high radiation angle. Because of mismatch the si
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-02/msg00010.html (10,441 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Loosing guy wires when hoisting antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 08:27:41 -0500
I am hoisting JK Mid Tri (100 lb) to 65' on a 100' 45G. There are 3 sets of guy wires at 32', 62' and 95'. I am not clearing one guy at 62'. If I remove that guy wire, should I loosen the other guy w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-02/msg00109.html (6,719 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Loosing guy wires when hoisting antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:11:27 -0500
Thank you all for the very useful comments. In the end, I moved the hoist point from 80' to 95', and the antenna cleared the guys. My wife helped (grudgingly but effectively) looking at the antenna a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-02/msg00120.html (7,968 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical question (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:00:27 -0400
My feeling is that modeling with verticals is less than perfect or perhaps the interpretation of results from modeling is imperfect. In 160m contests we hear signals that are poor, OK and spectacular
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-03/msg00153.html (12,018 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical question (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 20:54:50 -0400
N6LF study was in OR (?) with good soil and on 40m. W8JI found by measurements that elevated radials (in GA) on 160m work a few db below the ground radials. His results as well as experiences of othe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-03/msg00170.html (20,080 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 RECEIVE ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:13:10 -0400
For small space: Coax or magnetic loop - quiet but does not hear DX well K9AY - quiet with some but not great directivity DxEngineering 4 square - good directivity but seem to require switching off o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-04/msg00090.html (10,152 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] OptiBeam OB2-40M (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:54:41 -0400
OB40-M weighs 35 kg (77 lb) and by specs it covers all of 40m with SWR < 2. A shortened Moxon from JK Antennas: JK 402-Piccolo with coils weighs 88 lb and covers only 250 KHz. A full size Moxon JK420
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-05/msg00079.html (11,135 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Weird lightning hit (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 15:32:25 -0400
My QTH has two sets of antennas. A 100 ft tower with phased beams at 100 and 60 ft, also supporting 4 sq for 80 and shunt fed for 160m. Some 120ft apart, a Spiderbeam on a 45 ft aluminum Spiderpole a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00003.html (7,358 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Weird lightning hit (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:39:55 -0400
He did! And he told me to ground it with three 10ft grounding rods! Tnx Dan for putting up the tower! Igancy NO9E _______________________________________________ _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00006.html (7,416 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Carbon fiber for mast and antennas (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:08:57 -0400
Gigaparts has a line for carbon fiber masts from 25ft that they say can support up to 30 lb. The masts are incredibly light. A 34 ft mast weighs 5lb and a 50ft mast is 9 lb. I tried them at the SEDCO
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00027.html (8,147 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu