Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:no9e@arrl.net: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun question (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:07:53 -0400
RG11 possibly would withstand many KW. Its loss on 40m is miniscule, around 0.4 db/100'. Even the loss of the smaller RG6 is negligible (0.7 db/100'). I use Commscope Rg6 ($80 for 1000') in my 4 sq o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00058.html (9,807 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun question (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 22:31:42 -0400
Regarding the power handling of the F connector... I just unpacked 2m9x, the 9 element for 2m by M2. It has a phasing line (or balun) made of RG6 (60% coverage) and flimsy looking crimp type F connec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00169.html (13,359 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Full-size 30m rotatable dipole has big swing in low SWR point (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:17:25 -0400
Must be some strange interaction, especially that SWR is high. JK Antennas recommend testing the antenna prior to installation a couple of feet off the ground, stating that resonances should be lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-10/msg00190.html (9,895 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] FA-VA5 question (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:12:47 -0500
If someone can afford the new RigExpert analyzer, the question will be gone. I have many analyzers: cheap nanoVNA, expensive VWNA3E, accurate FA-VA4.... But my first tool to use is RigExpert, before
/archives//html/Towertalk/2021-11/msg00029.html (8,752 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:04:08 +0100
On4un writes that many stations find elevated radials to be a few db below ground radials. I believe this is ground dependent. At my new QTH, initially I set up inv U about 80 ft high with 4 125 ft e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00036.html (10,476 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Radials on ground v FCP (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:49:36 -0500
Here are the facts. N6BT made measurements on 40m. He found that radials inches of the air are much better than many more on the ground. His QTH is OR with very good soil. He also found for ground ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00047.html (9,822 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] FCP on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:29:11 -0500
W8JI writes that inv L with short radials is similar to a low bent dipole. Low dipole has a high angle of radiation. While the accuracy of modeling horizontal antennas is high, those of vertical ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00067.html (8,868 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Reflector in the back of shunt tower for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 10:17:32 -0500
I am trying to get some gain on 160m where currently I have a shunt fed 100m tower. It works well but is not spectacular. I modeled a reflector some 100 ft away from the tower. Either as inv L with o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00154.html (7,699 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Reflector in the back of shunt tower for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:04:19 -0500
Steve, Excellent work and sorry for missing it. I was thinking about a quick design. Elevated radials, not 100 ground ones. T coming from top of tower on ropes. Also 30m spacing so SWR changes less c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00156.html (8,942 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Reflector in the back of shunt tower for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 11:43:40 -0500
I redid the simulations. WIth actual dimensions, the gain was 3 db lossless, 2 db with 10 Ohm of extra resistance, and 1 db with 20 Ohm extra resistance. It took 3 hrs to make the reflector.I adjuste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-01/msg00160.html (11,745 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] FOLLOW UP & SOLUTION ..RE Quiet 27" monitors ?????/ (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:59:50 -0500
Very smart move with the SDR. Seems low noise and 14V are big assets. Is Samsung sensitivity to RF extending to antennas 100 ft away? New PCs including NUC support USB-C monitors where monitor chain
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00071.html (12,763 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] Routing cables under buried radials (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:19:12 -0500
I have a 100 ft tower that is surrounded by 36 100 ft radials and 4 x 20 50 radials. Coax and rotor cable are buried. The area is planted with grass. I would like to add more radials but a question i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00072.html (8,162 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] Routing cables under buried radials (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 21:46:54 -0500
Unfortunately it is Georgia clay, sometimes mixed with sand, and a few inches of topsoil. Ignacy NO9E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-02/msg00080.html (13,603 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] Modifications to TIC Ring (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:57:15 -0500
I ordered a TIC Ring. Initially it came uneven and Carl sent a replacement. This one is even but slightly oval and not exactly level. So when the ring rotates, it is very tight fit at some angles and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-03/msg00011.html (7,409 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Modifications to TIC Ring (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 21:23:29 -0500
Keith, Please send the modifications. My tower is 45g. Ignacy NO9E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-03/msg00013.html (9,266 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Modifications to TIC Ring (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:27:36 -0500
The driving gear is close to the roller but the problem is with the position gear. It is now wider than before and is positioned in the middle of the rollers. Some spring mechanism would have helped
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-03/msg00015.html (9,931 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] coax and leaks (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 10:44:20 -0400
How important is cable quality to avoid leaks? Some cables have more braiding and some less. Some have an aluminum foil and some don't. If a cable checks well for loss and impedance, is it likely to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00001.html (6,658 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] NCDXF Vertical Performance @ 500 Feet (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:50:51 -0400
Recently the propagation has improved and high and low beams have a similar performance whereas before there was a 2 S difference. Enjoy the sunspots. Ignacy _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00047.html (8,847 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Feeding single band HF yagis 500+ ft from the shack (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:27:32 -0400
1 db and even 2 db is hard to discern. But it would clearly have an effect when quantified as success in thousands of attempted QSOs, e.g., in contesting. So we can look at the issue in statistical t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-05/msg00105.html (12,404 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 m 4-square high SWR with no obvious reason why - using COMTEK ACB-80 (score: 1)
Author: Ignacy Misztal <no9e@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:42:44 +0200
Bob, Terrible problem with the splinter. We nearly always to remember to do certain tasks with gloves, but sometimes we forget. If money is available, the dxengineering 4sq is way above that of Comte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-07/msg00050.html (14,998 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu