- 1. [TowerTalk] 75 and 160 m antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Earle Sanders" <nt7y@xmission.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:33:39 -0700
- Due to a mishap on thanksgiving day my BCS project is now on the ground bent and mangled. I was in the final process of tuning the "beast" for optimum performance on my favorite frequencies. There is
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00128.html (7,222 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] temporary antenna (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Earle Sanders" <nt7y@xmission.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:51:24 -0700
- my 160 and 75 vertical crashed on thanksgiving day. it was sitting on top of a great radial field of 100 radials. i have cleared away the wreckage and am now faced with the problem of putting up a te
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00456.html (8,108 bytes)
- 3. RE: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Earle Sanders" <nt7y@xmission.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:40:11 -0700
- I have to admit that I am in aan enviable position...whatever the number of radials I need that is what I install. The more the Merrier. in my major radial field below the vertical I had 120 radials
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00479.html (9,754 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TowerTalk]Being cheap vs. being frugal (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Earle Sanders" <nt7y@xmission.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:00:44 -0600
- ood Thoughts.... My wife has said many times At least I Know Where you are at nights". She had only an inkling of actua; costs of tower. coax and stuff in the ham room. I can live with what i've spen
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00552.html (13,884 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu