Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mymts.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower climbing (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:25:59 -0500
Just one example, not necessarily the best, but found in less than a seconds worth of google. https://www.cabletiesandmore.ca/black-wire-looms-40-188?gclid=CjwKCAjw6-_eBRBXEiwA-5zHabWvfrtLZDGS8IiPvEX
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-11/msg00041.html (11,905 bytes)

182. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Rooftop tower as Vertical Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:39:09 -0600
It seems to me the trick will be electrically isolating that which you want as an antenna from any conductors (ground wire, rotator cable, coax shield, etc.) leading down from the system. Tuned radia
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-12/msg00216.html (11,128 bytes)

183. Re: [TowerTalk] Ropes in trees (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 19:04:42 -0600
Ive had some success on shorter (40-50ft) trees using a slingshot, with a high-density weight (heavy but not huge). Of course, it helps I can shoot in such a way as to not care where it lands. If you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-12/msg00259.html (11,620 bytes)

184. Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:40:37 -0600
I remember being at one of Deans presentations in Rochester, Minn., and if I recall correctly, the value in one model was picking the optimal height for all three tribander bands: I dont know if it w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00169.html (9,252 bytes)

185. Re: [TowerTalk] The Value of HFTA (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:01:06 -0600
I think you were missing my point: the value in modelling to pick the right height. Isnt that what youre also saying? 73, kelly, ve4xt _______________________________________________ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-01/msg00171.html (11,885 bytes)

186. Re: [TowerTalk] Weatherproof Remote Antenna Switch Box Plus (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:59:27 -0500
Does one really require, or even want, water-tightness? Any water that accumulates, due to condensation, needs a place to go, either via weep holes or a means to escape through evaporation. Also, if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-03/msg00124.html (12,725 bytes)

187. Re: [TowerTalk] K1PEK de NW2K - Towertalk Ads (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:50:58 -0500
Moreover, Id say the reflector is populated with enough people with enough knowledge and/or experience (K9YC, Jim Lux (sorry, he rarely signs his call but I know he has one), K7LXC, K3LR, K7NV, AB7E,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00110.html (12,108 bytes)

188. Re: [TowerTalk] KF4BWG (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:12:35 -0400
It would be interesting to see whether cutting different strands of the ribbon cable different lengths had an appreciable effect on bandwidth. I suspect not, as the capacitance between conductors so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00134.html (9,874 bytes)

189. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE 419-B info. (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:51:46 -0500
The ICE419 now on Array Solutions website looks substantially different than the unit seen in Jims comparison. Anyone know if its any better? 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhone ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00231.html (17,896 bytes)

190. Re: [TowerTalk] 4.3-10 Connector for RG8 (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:51:02 -0500
Too bad theres no way to look something like that up, maybe some kind of global information network, perhaps? ;-) https://www.amphenolrf.com/connectors/4-3-10.html 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-04/msg00240.html (8,564 bytes)

191. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Removal 40' (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 5 May 2019 20:16:57 -0500
I suspect the current owner felt he was doing you a big favour by letting you take the tower for free if you took it down. What is it they say is paved with good intentions? I talked to a former co-w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-05/msg00028.html (8,599 bytes)

192. Re: [TowerTalk] Archives (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:24:39 -0500
I simply cant think of a more worthless pursuit in ham radio than insert your favourite ham activity here. Now it sounds a little petty, doesnt it? Ham radios wide variety of activity means theres so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-06/msg00144.html (11,057 bytes)

193. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX Version History... (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 21:52:01 -0500
The Rohn BX towers accomplished tapering by having definite swaging near the top of each section, while Delhi towers had a continuous taper from top to bottom for most 48, 56 and 64-foot versions. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00015.html (11,432 bytes)

194. [TowerTalk] Wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 19:32:53 -0500
Hi all, Looks like I might finally get my tower up at the cottage this year, but in the interim, Im looking at/for some ideas on improving station performance. Antennas now include a delta loop for 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00037.html (7,592 bytes)

195. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 07:26:03 -0500
Understood perfectly, Jim. Just saying it's worked for me, but now I'm looking for more. 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00040.html (8,378 bytes)

196. Re: [TowerTalk] Fall Zone (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:39:35 -0700
I remember one ham, back when I started, referring to a BAY-lun coil for that antenna Or the guy on Facebook asking how to make two pieces of wire, in a dipole arrangement, cover 1.8 to 54 MHz I can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00142.html (10,853 bytes)

197. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials vs. cows (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:31:19 -0500
Plan a really, really big bbq with all your friends! ;-) 73, kelly, ve4xt Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-07/msg00420.html (8,456 bytes)

198. Re: [TowerTalk] Invisible Tower Paint (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:27:48 -0500
Why, you use the invisible owl, of course! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-08/msg00239.html (8,496 bytes)

199. Re: [TowerTalk] High VSWR (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 08:27:50 -0500
I can see the attraction of a system such as this to government, where a single antenna to cover all of HF might be needed, but in an amateur station, it seems like a ton of money putting all eggs in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00005.html (10,249 bytes)

200. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling vs Experimenting Crowds (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 08:29:32 -0500
This all seems to explain very well the strident defence some hams try to make for a certain manufacturer whose antennas regularly place dead last in objective comparison tests: "well I put up my (in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-09/msg00304.html (19,745 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
This search system is powered by Namazu