Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w5dxp@hotmail.com: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] 450 ohm ladder line (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:05:54 -0600
A high current point is exactly where one needs to feed the antenna. You probably brought a high voltage point into the shack and it arced - hard to match and dangerous. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com ____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00442.html (8,159 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] July 2005 QST Article (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:09:24 -0600
One can add 30m, 20m, 17m, 15m, 12m, and 10m to a 40m rotatable dipole simply by feeding it with ladder-line. Here's an article on the subject: http://www.w5dxp.com/rotdip.htm -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00551.html (7,457 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:29:49 -0600
It's twue, it's twue. (from "Blazing Saddles") -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _________________________________________________________________ Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple sear
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00557.html (8,705 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:30:44 -0600
Point is, you don't have to do that with an SG-230. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _________________________________________________________________ Search for grocery stores. Find gratitude. Turn a simple
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00566.html (9,788 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:34:13 -0600
A standard G5RV is a pretty good antenna for 80m, 40m, 20m, and 12m. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _________________________________________________________________ Laugh, share and connect with Windows L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00567.html (8,720 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:23:26 -0600
I prefer to do as little work as possible. Put up any length of dipole (at least 3/8WL long at the lowest operating frequency) and feed it with ladder-line. Sit in the warmth of the shack and adjust
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00578.html (8,303 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 49, Issue 77 (re-radiation) (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:04:30 -0600
Re-radiated localized near-field noise from a resonant antenna system can affect the far-field S/N ratio in a nearby antenna. From end-to-end, two opposing elevated radials are 1/2WL and thus parasi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00580.html (7,692 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:12:55 -0600
From: "k6xyz" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net> Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment The link dosent work It's because www.qsl.net is down. I'm in the process of moving all my information from theww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00581.html (8,152 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:28:19 -0600
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment I earlier posted a URL that depended upon www.qsl.net being up which it wasn't. I have transferred all those files to another server so the informati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00587.html (9,082 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole length adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:33:58 -0600
Sorry, I didn't write that but it is true anyway. If one wants to run 1500 watts with no antenna tuner, one can do it the way I did it. I developed my matching method because I didn't want to spring
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00613.html (10,360 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Is qsl.net still working. I can't bring it up? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:47:00 -0600
QSL.NET had a web page saying they were replacing their server but it crashed. :-( I moved all my stuff over to 1and1.com -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _____________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00754.html (7,243 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-316 choke cables (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:57:57 -0600
Hi Bob, I have some and used it for awhile but I felt a lot better using RG-400 which has a diameter of 0.195". All my baluns and short lengths of coax cable are made from RG-400 now. I didn't have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00025.html (8,405 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Managing Balanced line transitions (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:43:54 -0600
OTOH, in my situation, they are always matched and see something close to 450 ohms. I put the tuner at the antenna. I wouldn't recommend running 350 meters of OWL in a mismatched condition due to the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00050.html (8,332 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Managing Balanced line transitions (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:16:44 -0600
From: "Allan H. Kaplan" <w1ael@arrl.net> Subject: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Managing Balanced line transitions Let me explain that my advice against using baluns in connection with open-wire line was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00059.html (8,235 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Managing Balanced line transitions (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:35:09 -0600
Hmmmm, the misconception seems to be mostly yours. The differential transmission line current fields *cancel* in the core so, technically, they don't go "through the core". If the currents are perfe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00067.html (10,173 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Managing Balanced line transitions (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:24:31 -0600
From: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Subject: Re: Managing Balanced line transitions through the core". Consider two wires passing through a ferrite core. If they carry id
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00103.html (8,986 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Ferrite Cores in Trapped Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:24:41 -0600
It is an intriguing idea for a top-loaded mobile antenna. One of the problems with pure top loading is to keep the field of the coil from encountering the top hat. A T-500-2 core would pretty much c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00131.html (8,843 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:19:19 -0600
Assuming 1500 watts and a feedpoint impedance of 35 ohms, the feedpoint current is ~6.5 amps. When that current divides among 100 paralleled radials, each radial carries ~65 mA, no big deal for #24.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00223.html (7,873 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Ladder Line Length (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:38:47 -0600
In general, the optimum ladder-line length results in an SWR current maximum point existing somewhere around the point where the ladderline interfaces with the balun. That's a low, near-resonant imp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00317.html (7,849 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:50:09 -0600
Every loading coil has a self-resonant frequency somewhere above the frequency it is used on for mobile operation. It occurs at the frequency where the distributed capacitive reactance is equal to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00318.html (8,221 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu