Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Adding\s+to\s+existing\s+radial\s+field\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Adding\s+to\s+existing\s+radial\s+field\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Adding to existing radial field (score: 1): Author: Stewart Rolfe via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:09:52 +0000 (GMT); Any thoughts on adding additional radials to an existing system which has long since disappeared into the sward? This would inevitably involve a lot of random 'crossings' which I recall reading isn't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00210.html (6,932 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Adding to existing radial field (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:37:05 -0600; How many radials are already down? What frequencies is the antenna used for? How long are the existing radials? 73 Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________ ___________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-11/msg00222.html (6,990 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Adding to existing radial field (score: 1): Author: Stewart Rolfe via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:41:48 +0000 (GMT); Any thoughts on adding additional radials to an existing system which has long since disappeared into the sward? This would inevitably involve a lot of random 'crossings' which I recall reading isn't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-12/msg00056.html (6,944 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding to existing radial field (score: 1): Author: Artek Manuals <Manuals@ArtekManuals.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 02:18:07 -0500; Stew I think most of the earlier concern about radial crossing was for elevated radials. Lets say you had 16 on/in ground radials to begin with. Adding say another 8 or 16 on top of those would be v; /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-12/msg00063.html (9,160 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]