Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+B\s+olted\s+connections\s+to\s+concrete\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+B\s+olted\s+connections\s+to\s+concrete\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] B olted connections to concrete (score: 1): Author: Nick Pair <daweezil2003@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:32:36 -0700 (PDT); No form of connection directly to the concrete will give you any additional radial length or ability to dissipate any currents. You would need a low impedance connection to any( a lot of driveways do; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00139.html (7,429 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] B olted connections to concrete (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:49:14 -0700; Okay, I see what you mean, Nick. My train of thought really jumped the track on this one. There's nothing magic about the conductivity of concrete. The conductivity of the concrete is probably on par; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00143.html (9,412 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] B olted connections to concrete (score: 1): Author: Nick Pair <daweezil2003@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:17:10 -0700 (PDT); Hi Mike, You are right in a general sense. But if you do check at the base and are able to vary the vertical length and the radial length, you will find that there is a correlation between the radial; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00153.html (8,222 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] B olted connections to concrete (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:54:50 -0500; Tuned radials do not exist when buried or laid on the ground. The velocity factor on the wire is much slower when on or in the ground. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ _; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00172.html (7,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]