Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BPL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+BPL\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@prexar.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:33:30 +0000; Last week, KQ2M and I had an interesting exchange of thoughts about BPL that set me to thinking. The "set-up" is that I live in a hollow in rural area, cable TV runs .7 miles from my house, I am with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00001.html (8,104 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tom" <N4RS@iamotelephone.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:08:31 -0500; I left a newsgroup last week because of a "Flaming War". The newsgroup had nothing to do with BPL. It was totally off topic there and it is here. There is a BPL newsgoup, I suggest you take your comm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00012.html (10,022 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "George Lee" <geokr5c@cablelynx.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:18:04 -0700; I love the Tower Talk Reflector. I would also love to NOT see anymore BPL exchanges or political nuances. Thanks for helping to rid the reflector of such. 73, George KR5C ____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00548.html (6,557 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@worldpath.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:53:58 -0400; Can we take BPL off TT? Please! 73, Craig Clark, K1QX RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTORE PO BOX 209 RINDGE NH 03461 603 899 6957 WWW.RADIO-WARE.COM _______________________________________________ See: htt; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00579.html (7,052 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:04:06 -0700; John Kerry is live on Las Vegas CH 3 making a speech to the AARP convention being held here. He just said he supports BPL as a means of getting the internet to rural areas so kids can have a better e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00342.html (8,140 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-Online.Net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:20:11 -0500; Wonder how much the BPL folks have contributed to their campaigns. 73, Jim KG0KP -- Original Message -- From: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net> To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> Cc: "Tower Ta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00343.html (9,447 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:23:52 -0400; I wonder why everyone is for BPL except those who understand it? Jim Miller wrote: Wonder how much the BPL folks have contributed to their campaigns. 73, Jim KG0KP -- Original Message -- From: "Alan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00344.html (9,354 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:40:36 -0400; campaigns. You can bet a significant amount. It's unfortunate the ARRL doesn't get the Hams together like the NRA does. Someday we will face the fact the FCC is a political tool now, and NOT the ind; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00345.html (8,245 bytes)
9. Fw: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:06:45 -0500; a any _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00347.html (11,742 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "ChetMoore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:32:40 -0400; I don't recall seeing anything from the cable companies. Seems to me they should be very much against BPL. Did I miss something? messenger. ___________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00348.html (11,275 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:53:35 -0700; Both Bush and Kerry support BPL. Hey, that's 500,000 votes for Nader! N7XY _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weath; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00350.html (8,287 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:16:22 -0400; And it's a done deal. I just received a note the FCC ruled on it today. Roger (K8RI) Bob Nielsen wrote: On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:40:36PM -0400, Tom Rauch wrote: Wonder how much the BPL folks have c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00351.html (10,452 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:21:50 -0400; What did they rule and where is it? ruled on it today. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00352.html (8,716 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:26:29 -0400; Tom et al: Rat cheer: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/10/14/1/?nc=1 . 73 de Gene Smar AD3F Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00353.html (9,839 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Larry Emery" <k1uo@uninets.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:27:34 -0400; CNN has had a notice that FCC approved BPL for the past couple hours on the scrolling banner at bottom og the screen. -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> To: "Tower (K8RI)"; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00354.html (9,605 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:48:00 -0400; Gene Smar wrote: Tom et al: Rat cheer: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/10/14/1/?nc=1 . The FCC Democrats are posturing like Kerry, big words but zero action -- they could have made a big noise; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00355.html (9,971 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:39:46 -0400; Hey Doc, It is really APPALLING that you can take an issue like this, that affects ALL of us, and use it as an flimsy excuse to slam Democrats! The last time that I checked, it was Michael Powell, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00356.html (10,348 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:59:30 -0400; Nothing appalling at all -- I was just responding to the posturing of the Dems on the ARRL site -- the Republicans didn't pretend that they were friends of Hams while doing nothing, the Dems did. Obv; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00357.html (10,541 bytes)
19. RE: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:57:05 -0500; I suggest we don't have time to spend on divisive conversation. After the BPL issue has been resolved satisfactorily for amateurs why don't we pick up the political conversation -- in the interim per; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00358.html (12,234 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:01:06 -0700; At 04:23 PM 10/14/2004 -0400, Tower (K8RI) wrote: I wonder why everyone is for BPL except those who understand it? Because there's gold in them thar speculative hills for all those talking about it..; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00360.html (8,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]