Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+XM240\s+vs\.\s+M2\s+2\s+and\s+3\s+ele\s+lin\s+loaded\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Cushcraft\s+XM240\s+vs\.\s+M2\s+2\s+and\s+3\s+ele\s+lin\s+loaded\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 vs. M2 2 and 3 ele lin loaded (score: 1): Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:05:40 -0700; Is the Cushcraft XM240 still the best bang for the buck. Setup will be a AN tower 70ft self supporting. 40m beam on the top at about 85ft. SteppIR 4ele under it. I have an older 40-2CD that could be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00022.html (7,593 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 vs. M2 2 and 3 ele lin loaded (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:36:02 -0600; I made the decision to go with the XM240. I have the same combo, XM240 over a 4 element SteppIR. So far the XM240 has been a good antenna, but it has only been up for a short time. It is working well; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00024.html (8,589 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 vs. M2 2 and 3 ele lin loaded (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:40:27 -0600; Also here are a couple more references to XM240 problems you might want to read. http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00534.html http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00027.html (9,335 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 vs. M2 2 and 3 ele lin loaded (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:00:45 -0600; I have had a XM240 up at 135 feet since 2001. I have never had problems with mine. I don't know how much the M2 antennas cost or their physical size but I think that the XM240 hits the "sweet spot".; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00032.html (10,107 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 vs. M2 2 and 3 ele lin loaded (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:50:23 -0700; Is the Cushcraft XM240 still the best bang for the buck. Setup will be a AN tower 70ft self supporting. 40m beam on the top at about 85ft. SteppIR 4ele under it. I have an older 40-2CD that could be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00055.html (8,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]