Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Change\s+in\s+Frequency\s+As\s+Antenna\s+Height\s+Rises\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:45:31 -0400
It seems to me that Steve's, G3TXQ and Dan's, AC6LA diagrams coincide pretty well. You find the lowest frequency at about 1/4 wave and max frequency at about 1/2 above ground. What I don't understand
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00018.html (12,162 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:06:59 +0100
It's clearly not as simple as a "capacitance to ground" effect. The cyclic nature of the resonant frequency vs height, plus the fact that it is more pronounced over better-conducting ground, suggests
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00021.html (10,367 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:11:00 -0700
It seems to me that Steve's, G3TXQ and Dan's, AC6LA diagrams coincide pretty well. You find the lowest frequency at about 1/4 wave and max frequency at about 1/2 above ground. What I don't understand
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00023.html (11,587 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:33:42 -0700
The cyclic nature of the resonant frequency vs height, plus the fact that it is more pronounced over better-conducting ground, suggests to me that is related to the "interference" effect outlined in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00025.html (11,073 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:47:03 -0700
You guys are way above my head :-) I had no idea the resonant freq goes up and down as the antenna travels on its way up. I thought it just went up on a steep curve till about 15 feet then gradually
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00031.html (12,647 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:07:09 -0700
It can be tough to provide a simple explanation of a complicated issue, but I tried about a week ago in this thread. :) It is FAR more than capacitance to ground, although that's a component. The com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00032.html (11,748 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:22:20 -0700
It can be tough to provide a simple explanation of a complicated issue, but I tried about a week ago in this thread. :) It is FAR more than capacitance to ground, although that's a component. The com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00033.html (12,546 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:00:52 -0400
Towertalk is definitely educational! I was also not aware of the way the resonant frequency changed at low heights. I still see no point in checking the SWR of an antenna near the ground. You can use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00037.html (7,509 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 20:22:25 -0700
Actually, measuring SWR (or resonant frequency) might be useful close to the ground to make sure it's assembled right with the right traps, etc. The trick is you need to compare the resonant frequen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00038.html (7,712 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Paul Braiman <braimanbiz@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 21:02:34 -0700
The folks from SteppIR mention just such a check in their DB18 assembly manual. It was reassuring to see it resonate somewhere on all bands before I went through the effort to get it onto the tower.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00039.html (9,436 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 21:52:28 -0700
On 6/1/16 9:02 PM, Paul Braiman wrote: The folks from SteppIR mention just such a check in their DB18 assembly manual. It was reassuring to see it resonate somewhere on all bands before I went throug
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00040.html (9,665 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Change in Frequency As Antenna Height Rises (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 18:11:03 +0100
Here are the resonant frequencies I measured of a 10m half-wave dipole on a telescopic push-up mast at various heights above ground in my back yard: 5ft 29.359MHz 10ft 30.499MHz 15ft 30.889MHz 20ft 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00054.html (8,266 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu