Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loading\s+a\s+Pro\-AM\s+160M\s+on\s+other\s+bands\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:03:31 -0500
A 160M dipole or doublet, depending on the feed system and antenna tuner may often serve as a complete 160-10M antenna. The Pro-Am 160M mobile vertical is, of course, designed specifically for 160M -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00315.html (7,262 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:24:49 -0500
Yes. The load and antenna impedance are such that the coil reactance goes up while the antenna reactance goes down in frequency. What you end up with is that the loading structures act more or less
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00316.html (8,130 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:50:09 -0600
Every loading coil has a self-resonant frequency somewhere above the frequency it is used on for mobile operation. It occurs at the frequency where the distributed capacitive reactance is equal to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00318.html (8,221 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:33:13 -0800
So that it would look like a series capacitor above the self resonant frequency, right? On a high enough frequency, the series X from the C might be pretty small... Before leaping to "usually" and "e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00320.html (8,736 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:12:10 -0600
Yep, at some frequency, the EM waves won't know that the coil even exists. :-) -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com _________________________________________________________________ Mortgage rates as low as 4.62
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00321.html (8,484 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:19:00 -0600
Well, a loaded mobile antenna usually has only one coil. With a trapped antenna, the trap closest to the feedpoint is the highest frequency trap. So self-resonance in a trapped antenna is turned int
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00322.html (8,285 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:29:03 -0500
Could one shift the resonance for use on other bands using a source of switched inductance at the base or perhaps switched or variable capacitance? Makes for a fun exploration of possibilities and a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00323.html (9,271 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: "Cecil Moore" <w5dxp@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:19:47 -0600
From: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net> Could one shift the resonance for use on other bands using a source of switched inductance at the base or perhaps switched or variable capacitance? Before there were scr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00324.html (8,241 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Loading a Pro-AM 160M on other bands? (score: 1)
Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:41:21 -0500
Sort of like the Outbacker? -- Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com Personal: http://bibleseven.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00325.html (8,485 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu