Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+Antenna\s+Question\s*$/: 105 ]

Total 105 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:26:10 -0800
Thanks, Jeff. There are some mechanical issues with that in this installation. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00392.html (9,068 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:00:17 -0500
On another subject..any comments/reflections on the addition of the Mosley rotatable dipole addition/option to the Mosley TA-53M or their other antennas? -Mike Thanks, Jeff. There are some mechanical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00393.html (9,679 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:09:10 -0800
Thanks, Jeff. There are some mechanical issues with that in this installation. 73, Jim ## another option is to cut the parasitic ele as a DIR. Then relay switchin some uh in each leg...to make it a R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00394.html (9,205 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 00:42:50 -0800
Thanks for the suggestions, but thanks to limitations of the installation, I'm stuck with what I've got up in the air. What I have is simply two dipoles cut for the middle of the band, fed with RG11.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00395.html (8,971 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:21:51 -0500
Jim, you already know this but will mention as a reminder: In addition to open and short, you can also terminate the shack end of the coax in a + or - reactance to achieve whatever reactance needed a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00396.html (10,004 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:50:33 -0600
If you want to see some outrageous gain claims, take a look at the Telrex catalog: http://www.qsl.net/ve2eh/telrex_antenna_april_1985_ve2eh.pdf Doug I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00398.html (10,825 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:36:25 -0600
Jim you make an interesting statement. Maybe it is similar to ranking receivers according to their narrow spaced dynamic range. I use a 756 Pro III which is way, way down on Sherwood's list and yet i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00399.html (10,508 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Weigel" <tomweigel1@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 07:08:30 -0600
Mike: Last summer I added the WARC element conversion kit to my CL-33. It works perfectly. Will add, the tech I spoke with at Mosley was most courteous and the install went smoothly. The new traps an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00402.html (11,237 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:02:44 -0800
I was looking at the scores on 3830 from the ARRL CW DX test and saw this score from a QRP operator.: "Total: 1108 314 Total Score = 1,043,736 Club: Contest Club Ontario Comments: K3(5W), TA-33 @ 50'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00414.html (10,336 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:14:47 -0600
The fundamental point is that there are better beams available - if performance is is the emphasis. The Mosely's have a good reputation of not falling down in the ice and around here that's a HUGE fa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00416.html (11,475 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:20:45 -0700
Tom, You hit the nail on the head. Nobody said that XXXXX doesn't work. I worked JA's on my Cantenna with 100 watts on 10m. You can work people on anything. I didn't pull my tower over in favor of st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00417.html (11,380 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 18:55:36 -0800
Imagine how high his score could have been with 2 or 3 db more! 73, George T Daughters, K6GT CU in the California QSO Party (CQP) October 3-4, 2015 _______________________________________________ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00418.html (9,893 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 07:24:03 -0800
Tom, You hit the nail on the head. Nobody said that XXXXX doesn't work. I worked JA's on my Cantenna with 100 watts on 10m. You can work people on anything. I didn't pull my tower over in favor of st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00425.html (9,366 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:51:41 -0800
Tom, You hit the nail on the head. Nobody said that XXXXX doesn't work. I worked JA's on my Cantenna with 100 watts on 10m. You can work people on anything. I didn't pull my tower over in favor of st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00426.html (12,744 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:23:38 -0600
The TH7 is not a bad antenna, I find it difficult to believe that a C3 out performs it. I had the world high 20m score in the last WPX CW using a Hy-Gain TH7DXX John P40A . People were saying there c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00427.html (8,871 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:55:48 -0800
But you did it from P4, an island that is considered part of South America, with short hops to highly populated North America and Europe, so nearly all of your QSOs are 3-pointers, and probably with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00428.html (9,150 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:34:18 -0800
The TH7 is not a bad antenna, I find it difficult to believe that a C3 out performs it. I had the world high 20m score in the last WPX CW using a Hy-Gain TH7DXX John P40A ran that test. N6BT ran the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00449.html (9,538 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 01:40:39 -0800
cylinder will decrease the inductance of any coil. I'm not sure it actually changes the inductance.. The parasitic C in parallel can change the "end to end" reactance so that it looks like L is lower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00450.html (14,338 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:05:58 -0500
cylinder will decrease the inductance of any coil. I'm not sure it actually changes the inductance.. The parasitic C in parallel can change the "end to end" reactance so that it looks like L is lowe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00451.html (10,784 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:52:56 +0100
Why would someone want to compare a full size yagi with a mini beam? results will make u gag. Gets even worse when a TA-32jr is used. _______________________________________________ _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00452.html (8,600 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu