Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question

To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question
From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:14:47 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
The fundamental point is that there are better beams available - if performance is is the emphasis. The Mosely's have a good reputation of not falling down in the ice and around here that's a HUGE factor. So it depends on what a guy wants.

This score does not establish that the beam was a benefit or hindrance. Rather, the objective data that has been published suggests that IF he had a better MEASURED PERFORMING beam, his scores would surely have been better.

73/jeff/ac0c
www.ac0c.com
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie

-----Original Message----- From: Tom Osborne
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 7:02 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Antenna Question

I was looking at the scores on 3830 from the ARRL CW DX test and saw
this score from a QRP operator.:

"Total: 1108   314  Total Score = 1,043,736

Club: Contest Club Ontario

Comments:

K3(5W), TA-33 @ 50', wires"

I wonder if he knows the TA-33 doesn't work?????  73
Tom W7WHY





On 2/20/2015 7:50 AM, Doug Renwick wrote:
If you want to see some outrageous gain claims, take a look at the Telrex
catalog:

http://www.qsl.net/ve2eh/telrex_antenna_april_1985_ve2eh.pdf

Doug

I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>